Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-04-2011, 12:59 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Ed Witten Interview

Ed Witten has been described as Einstein's successor and the man who is intellectually far ahead of most of his peers.

He comes across as a humble man, but a communicator?
Dare I say Brian Cox would do a better job communicating to the masses.

http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1184753

Regards

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-04-2011, 01:21 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Now, if Ed had Brian's flare for communication, that would be a brilliant combination. But you rarely find that in any scientist...genius and communicative flare. The problem with genius is that people like this tend to think about 10 steps ahead of where they're talking and they can't get the words out to express what they're thinking. Not unless they can compartmentalise what they're thinking and then convert it into spoken words quickly enough to get across what their thoughts are. Just means the conversation might sound a little broken up.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-04-2011, 01:33 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Isn't it funny how brilliance in certain fields runs in families....Ed's being no exception. I can't remember their name, but there's a Hungarian family who have been brilliant mathematicians for well over 300 years. They're also brilliant at physics as well.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-04-2011, 01:34 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Now, if Ed had Brian's flare for communication, that would be a brilliant combination. But you rarely find that in any scientist...genius and communicative flare. The problem with genius is that people like this tend to think about 10 steps ahead of where they're talking and they can't get the words out to express what they're thinking. Not unless they can compartmentalise what they're thinking and then convert it into spoken words quickly enough to get across what their thoughts are. Just means the conversation might sound a little broken up.
I'm intrigued with what he says rather than how he says it.
Extra dimensions are easier to grasp than Quantum Field Theory and General Relativity. It says something about his mind.

Regards

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-04-2011, 01:35 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
I would have loved to view that video, but wow it is so Huge
too much for my bandwidth
cheers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-04-2011, 01:40 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Isn't it funny how brilliance in certain fields runs in families....Ed's being no exception. I can't remember their name, but there's a Hungarian family who have been brilliant mathematicians for well over 300 years. They're also brilliant at physics as well.
You might be referring to the Bernoulli family who were Swiss.
Two of them engaged in an on going battle with Newton.

Regards

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-04-2011, 01:46 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
I'm intrigued with what he says rather than how he says it.
Extra dimensions are easier to grasp than Quantum Field Theory and General Relativity. It says something about his mind.

Regards

Steven
I'd say he can visualise, or at least see the equations of supersymmetry in his mind more readily than the pure maths of QFT and GR, even though he denies he can. Doing those equations is like playing with building blocks whereas supersymmetry and higher dimensions is like using play dough or putty. They're two different approaches to handling the maths.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-04-2011, 01:48 PM
CraigS's Avatar
CraigS
Unpredictable

CraigS is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,023
I've watched this video before.

I have no problems with what he said .. but there again … Ed and I have 'connection' !

Me master !!

Any problems I have in understanding what he's saying, are only because I have insufficient knowledge of the physics he's talking about. Ed's style is rapid fire, but that's because he knows what he's talking about !

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-04-2011, 01:48 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
You might be referring to the Bernoulli family who were Swiss.
Two of them engaged in an on going battle with Newton.

Regards

Steven
I do know of the Bernoulli's, but this family were Hungarian, not Swiss. I'll probably remember their name later on, or find them somewhere. They're still around, actually.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-04-2011, 01:53 PM
CraigS's Avatar
CraigS
Unpredictable

CraigS is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Now, if Ed had Brian's flare for communication,
Carl,

C'mon man ..!!…

The two names just can't be used in the same sentence !

Do you mean Cox or Greene (I presume Cox).

Now, where is that cake of soap I just had ?

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-04-2011, 01:59 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Cox or Greene...doesn't matter
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17-04-2011, 02:00 PM
CraigS's Avatar
CraigS
Unpredictable

CraigS is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Cox or Greene...doesn't matter
There is a huge difference !

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17-04-2011, 02:03 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS View Post
There is a huge difference !

Cheers
Yeah, one of them knows how to dress properly and in clean clothes, to boot
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17-04-2011, 02:06 PM
CraigS's Avatar
CraigS
Unpredictable

CraigS is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Yeah, one of them knows how to dress properly and in clean clothes, to boot
Howz about Sir Ed vs Cox … !! …

Hair .. teeth … rationalism … no "k's" following "g's" at the ends of sentences, no waxing lyrical .. straight down to business, is Sir Ed (the almighty).



Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement