Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-12-2010, 09:01 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,271
Messier 46

Target: M46 (NGC2437) and NGC2438
Camera: QHY 8 OSC CCD
Exposure Capture: Maxim
Scope: GSO CF RC200 with WO F2 reducer
EFR: f/7
Mount: EQ6 Pro
Exposure Setting: Prime focus
Exposures: 10 x 6m and 4 x 10 min 1hr 40min between 11:0012/12/2010 and 1:00pm13/12/2010
Seeing: Slight moon, no wind, good seeing
Guiding: Orion Starshoot Autoguider using PHD with ED80
Focus: Bahitov mask
Stacking: DSS with flats darks and bias frames
Processing: PS CS3

Right Ascension 07 : 41.8 (h:m)
Declination -14 : 49 (deg:m)
Distance 5.4 (kly)
Visual Brightness 6.0 (mag)
Apparent Dimension 27.0 (arc min)
Located in Puppis Discovered 1771 by Charles Messier.
Messier 46 (M46, NGC 2437) was the first object Charles Messier discovered after he had published the first edition of his list (M1-M45). He added this one to his catalog on February 19, 1771, three days after presenting it to the academy, together with three more Messier objects, M47, M48, and M49.
The cluster is very rich, with 150 stars of mag 10-13 and probably a total population of over 500. The brightest of these stars are of spectral type A0, and each about 100 times more luminous than the Sun (the brightest is of apparent magnitude 8.7). This indicates an age of about 300 million years. The members are scattered over an angular diameter of about 27', corresponding to a linear extension of 30 light years at the cluster's distance of 5,400 light years, and are receding from us at 41.4 km/sec, according to Baade. M46 is classified as of Trumpler type II,2,r.
As a special and famous feature which is also obvious in our photograph, a planetary nebula (NGC 2438, also FC 87) appears within the apparent borders of M46. This object appears to lie near the northern fringes of the cluster. However, this nebula is most probably not a true member but is superimposed, or perhaps a passing "guest", because of three reasons:
  1. the radial velocity of NGC 2438 is about 77 km/sec recession, which is 43 km/sec different from the cluster's value and would not allow the cluster to hold it, even if it were at the same distance. Woldemar Götz, however, gives derived distances of 4,600 light years for the cluster and only about 2,900 light years for the nebula, which would mean that the planetary is a foreground object.
  2. planetary nebulae are only visible for short times and fade quickly; most of them are visible only for a few 10,000s of years before their material has volatilized into the surrounding interstellar space.
  3. planetary nebula are late states in stellar evolution, which occur only for comparatively low mass stars of less then 3 solar masses. These stars, however, need more than a billion years for their evolution until they eject their envelope to form the planetary, which is much longer than the age of M46 (more massive stars "go supernova"). However, this last argument is questionable, because some young clusters as the Pleiades (M45) contain a significant number of white dwarfs, which must have evolved from more massive stars; these stars must have lost most of their mass during their evolution, probably in the form of strong stellar winds in their Red Giant phase, and must have gone through a planetary nebula phase.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (1hr40m 16f 15f 15b 4d m46 v2 iis.jpg)
86.0 KB89 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-12-2010, 09:05 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Very nice Trevor, The little PN has come up a treat. This was my first light with my old Tak FS102.

Well done, love the colour.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-12-2010, 04:14 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,271
Thanks Doug I'm still amiss how to get that really nice finish on stars but it'll come one day (help anyone)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-12-2010, 04:25 PM
John Hothersall's Avatar
John Hothersall
Registered User

John Hothersall is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thornlands, Brisbane.
Posts: 1,346
That is a really nice image with great star colour and the pn has come out really well.

John.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-12-2010, 05:00 PM
davewaldo's Avatar
davewaldo
Tasmania

davewaldo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia - Hobart
Posts: 727
Love it!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-12-2010, 07:00 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,664
Yes, that's very cool Trevor and well imaged, I like it.

The donnut looks like its just hanging there to annoy the stars

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-12-2010, 08:40 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Nice shot Trevor and the star colours look fine to me. Not sure about the FF/reducer though.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-12-2010, 09:33 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,271
Thanks guys

Mark I've been wondering about the field flatness myself using the WOF2
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-12-2010, 10:26 PM
desler's Avatar
desler
Registered User

desler is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Werribee, Australia
Posts: 1,053
The field flatness may not be 100%, but producing results like that, I wouldn't worry too much trevor, I think it's stunning!

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-12-2010, 10:50 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,271
Thanks Darren
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15-12-2010, 11:01 AM
OzRob's Avatar
OzRob (Rob)
Registered User

OzRob is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Thailand
Posts: 446
Nice image. This one was already on my to do list.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15-12-2010, 11:08 AM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Looks good to me Trevor. A mild deconvolution may help with the stars. Another thing you could do is to select the stars, feather the selection a bit and crisp them up a bit with curves. You can also increase the saturation at the same time should you wish to. Seriously though I don't think you have too much of a problem there.

Cheers

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15-12-2010, 08:31 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,271
Thanks Rob and Steve

ps: did a slight repo don't know if any noticeable change
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (1hr40m 16f 15f 15b 4d m46 v2 iis.jpg)
86.3 KB9 views

Last edited by TrevorW; 15-12-2010 at 09:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement