Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-10-2010, 08:27 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,280
ic 2128 in Dorado

Not happy Jan can't sort out my flats, this is 1hr 33min caught on a windy night in Perth between 12:00 and 2:00am 30/10 used Maxim to guide for the first time

QHY8 OSC using the WO2 reducer through the RC, now someone mentioned to me recently that the glass on the reducer needs to be around 50mm from the CCD chip.

I didn't know this does makes a difference as the reducer on mine has always sat around 30mm.

Does it make that much of a difference
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ic2128 1hr 33m 17f 6d 12-10sf 15b dbe v1 iis.jpg)
80.8 KB92 views

Last edited by TrevorW; 02-11-2010 at 09:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-10-2010, 09:54 PM
Screwdriverone's Avatar
Screwdriverone (Chris)
I have detailed files....

Screwdriverone is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
That is really quite nice Trevor,

Interesting subject and quite a bit of nebulosity there that I didnt even know existed!

Very nice effort and nice to have a bit of variety too.

Cheers

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-10-2010, 11:17 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Trevor the spacings set for chip to glass must be kept as per design or the focal reduction and flattening will not be correct so it does matter alot actually. Try to get it within a mm of the stated value. Not sure what your reference to lens is about though?

I like the pic by the way, great colours .


Mark
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-10-2010, 11:31 PM
davewaldo's Avatar
davewaldo
Tasmania

davewaldo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia - Hobart
Posts: 727
Hi Trevor,

From my reading the spacing is very critical. However as you are not using this reducer for its intended scope, the best distance could be anything. So really experimentation is the only way to know for sure.... On refractors it is recommended to have 56mm spacing.

Good luck and this is a cool shot too!

Last edited by davewaldo; 31-10-2010 at 11:37 PM. Reason: late night engrish....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2010, 01:51 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,280
Thanks Guys

Mark I meant the CCD chip (not lens) sorry

Good point Dave that the the WO2 is designed for a refractor
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2010, 10:06 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Nice looking image with an interesting offset look it. I can just see the faint nebula showing through around and in the cluster.

Flattener or reducer distance is critical to flattening or reducing correctly. I got an adapter made up to a specific length to the sensor. I recommend you do the same.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2010, 11:03 AM
davewaldo's Avatar
davewaldo
Tasmania

davewaldo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia - Hobart
Posts: 727
You might like to grab either the baader adjustable T2 extenders or this guy sells ready-made QHY8 to MPCC spacers (requires same chip distance as your reducer).
http://www.tan14.com/Others.htm
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2010, 05:08 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,280
Thanks Paul and Dave.

I was nearly ready too dump this data, now I'm glad I didn't.

Cheers all
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-11-2010, 05:21 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Very nice Trev. Some good colors and details there.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-11-2010, 11:07 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Hi Trevor,

Jewels in the sky.....a very nice photo.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-11-2010, 12:07 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,280
Thanks Ross

I was also being dsylexic on the title
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-11-2010, 04:14 AM
Tom Davis's Avatar
Tom Davis (Tom)
Registered User

Tom Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Inkom, ID USA
Posts: 589
Wonderful target and image, Trevor!

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-11-2010, 09:06 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,280
Thanks Tom
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement