Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-10-2010, 05:12 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Jupiter 23 Oct 2010

Well I thought I had finally cracked a good night on Saturday night but alas it was not to be. The raw data looked very good but as often as can happen tired eyes see better seeing that is in reality. The seeing was not quite there to get great images and I think I in fact missed the better part of the seeing as each image got progressively worse.

While the red and green channels were good the blue channel on each of the images below was well below par. I probably rate the seeing about 6.5-7 out of 10. Several of my green channels looked very sharp but often the red channel would not be quite right or the blue channel just killed the image. Of the 65gig of data taken these were the best. Not my best for the season but better than nothing. It might also be time to start looking seriously for a new camera. This one has taken over 900 movies and might be starting to wear out.

1228UT

1302UT

1452UT

Feel free to comment.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-10-2010, 05:42 PM
John Hothersall's Avatar
John Hothersall
Registered User

John Hothersall is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thornlands, Brisbane.
Posts: 1,346
Good detail especially in the middle image of the 3 images, blue always seems to be the let down, but still a good set of images.

John.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-10-2010, 06:48 PM
Quark's Avatar
Quark (Trevor)
Registered User

Quark is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,109
Nice work Paul, it's just so frustrating to be so close to some good seeing, but there is still a lot to like about these images, heaps of detail and that really natural look about them.

I have also found that over this last month the seeing seems to have been better earlier than I expected, often data captured at just over 50 degrees alt has been better than latter on at 61 degrees alt. last night my worst data set, which I didn't post, was at 61.5 degrees alt.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-10-2010, 09:36 PM
Matt Wastell's Avatar
Matt Wastell (Matt)
Look up, look good!

Matt Wastell is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,762
Good results Paul - it can be a little weird when the raw images look good on the screen and when you process they do not deliver. I still think your images are tops!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-10-2010, 08:24 AM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
These are really fine images Paul.

Yeah, agree with Matt, what is it when raw images look OK but do not process quite so well?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-10-2010, 01:34 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Thanks guys.

Ray and Matt, its all about the seeing. One is only as good as their last great image. Most of the top planetary imagers are hampered by seeing issues. Nothing more than that. We all have top of the line gear for capturing but the reality is that the seeing either makes or breaks you. I had a cracker of a year in 2008, last year was ok but this year has been terrible. Nothing changed from my perspective except for the seeing. Seeing is king.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement