Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-11-2010, 08:45 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,374
Who out there in Astroland owns a Losmandy Titan?

I am seeking your views on the Losmandy Titan mount? How is it for Astrophotography and what type of payload do you have on it? Any pics of the loads and things to be aware of?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-11-2010, 08:48 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
I am seeking your views on the Losmandy Titan mount? How is it for Astrophotography and what type of payload do you have on it? Any pics of the loads and things to be aware of?
Try IIS member mtodman. He has one.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-11-2010, 08:55 PM
tlgerdes's Avatar
tlgerdes (Trevor)
Love the moonless nights!

tlgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,285
Matt runs an FSQ106 on his. Mike Berthon Jones from ASNSW has one and he runs a 12" planewave on it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-11-2010, 09:06 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Bird has one.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-11-2010, 09:08 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
And Jase
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-11-2010, 09:23 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Yeah, and look at Jase's images. : )

Jase sold his to Peter, from memory.

H
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-11-2010, 09:52 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlgerdes View Post
Matt runs an FSQ106 on his. Mike Berthon Jones from ASNSW has one and he runs a 12" planewave on it.
does Mike have a web site?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-11-2010, 10:38 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Zane (astroboy) has an HGM200 as well, and it currently hosts Guy Fleming's home-built RC.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-11-2010, 11:01 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
I am seeking your views on the Losmandy Titan mount? How is it for Astrophotography and what type of payload do you have on it? Any pics of the loads and things to be aware of?
You looking to get a new mount Dave?

If so, what about this?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-11-2010, 12:04 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
Yeah, and look at Jase's images. : )

Jase sold his to Peter, from memory.

H
Yep. Sure did.
It's now holding up an EdgeHD 1400/Hyperstar combo with piggy-back guider. It originally held an old C14 that now sits (don't laugh) on an EQ6 where it performs quite well as a planetary/lunar visual/webcam scope.
The Titan is a fabulous mount David.
PM me about coming out to TenChain Hill Obs to have a play.
Peter.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (EdgeHD14small.jpg)
159.5 KB98 views
Click for full-size image (CelestronFarm.jpg)
132.2 KB103 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15-11-2010, 06:14 AM
tlgerdes's Avatar
tlgerdes (Trevor)
Love the moonless nights!

tlgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
does Mike have a web site?
No, he doesnt.

He is currently designing a new controller for it, he doesnt like the Gemini. It has an issue where you cant control it via computer in both DEC and RA at the same time, you have to alternate. This issue only effects 0.001% of the Gemini install base (ie MBJ), as most people arent that fussy.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-11-2010, 12:26 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,637
Hey Houghy if you want one of the best mounts around in its class without the wait...here is your chance :

From the AP user group:

We have notified all of the people on the 900GTO list and have now
opened up the ordering process. You can order a 900GTO for Jan or Feb
delivery without going on the list. You can order directly from the
website or call the number below.

http://www.astro-physics.com/products/mounts/900gto/900gto.htm


Clear Skies!

Marj Christen
Vice President
Astro-Physics, Inc
11250 Forest Hills Road
Machesney Park, IL 61115
Phone: 815-282-1513
Fax: 815-282-9847
www.astro-physics.com
Please include this e-mail with your response.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19-11-2010, 12:31 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Hey Houghy if you want one of the best mounts around in its class without the wait...here is your chance :

From the AP user group:

We have notified all of the people on the 900GTO list and have now
opened up the ordering process. You can order a 900GTO for Jan or Feb
delivery without going on the list. You can order directly from the
website or call the number below.

http://www.astro-physics.com/products/mounts/900gto/900gto.htm


Clear Skies!

Marj Christen
Vice President
Astro-Physics, Inc
11250 Forest Hills Road
Machesney Park, IL 61115
Phone: 815-282-1513
Fax: 815-282-9847
www.astro-physics.com
Please include this e-mail with your response.
so in relation to a PME how does this one rate Mike? and i see this is similar in price to the titan
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 19-11-2010, 02:47 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
The Titan is (US) $6k, the 900GTO is $8.7k and the PME $14.5k, I dont think you can directly compare them Dave, the differences are proportion to the prices.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 19-11-2010, 02:50 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
so in relation to a PME how does this one rate Mike? and i see this is similar in price to the titan
Put it this way, if I was looking to buy a new mount to take my 12" that's coming I would email Marj straight away!

Not as heavy duty as the PME but I think the AP900 would be perfectly fine upto a 7" APO or 14" Catadioptric.

Same class as the Titan, Tak NJP and Tak EM400..but it would be an Astrophysics

Man, you would be the envy of everyone for sure

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 19-11-2010, 02:58 PM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
the differences are proportion to the prices.
...but the likelihood of SWMBO will dismember Dave is a certainty with any one of these mounts.


Last edited by RB; 19-11-2010 at 03:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 19-11-2010, 03:12 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Put it this way, if I was looking to buy a new mount to take my 12" that's coming I would email Marj straight away!

Not as heavy duty as the PME but I think the AP900 would be perfectly fine upto a 7" APO or 14" Catadioptric.

Same class as the Titan, Tak NJP and Tak EM400..but it would be an Astrophysics

Man, you would be the envy of everyone for sure

Mike
there is a fine line between envy and practical you seem to be the Astrophysics spokesperson for the minute

one dream has left the building and i have had to pass on it, but i am not going to rule out others in the future. Practically speaking the titan is achievable without decapitation, the others maybe? I suppose it comes dow nto use, practicality, support, bank for buck and parts and accessories
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 19-11-2010, 07:48 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Interesting thread with a variety of views. Good stuff!

Having owned a Losmandy Titan (regular, not 50:1 gearbox version) for a few years, I have to say that it is a very capable mount. Am sure Peter who purchased mine (noted in this thread) is now a happy camper. I found the mount worked very well for robotic operations having produced many images with it in this manner. However, don't be mistaken, its not a robotic mount. Mounts with absolute encoders offer true robotic operations having the ability to recover from a power outage. That said, if you ensure you "park" the mount each night after an imaging run has completed you can successfully power up, night after night, platesolve and continue imaging from where you last left off. However if you have a power outage during an imaging run (common in remote locations where dark skies exist I should add - talking from experience here!), the mount struggles and needs human intervention to keep the pointing aligned through regular syncs. If anything, the Gemini software is a force to be reckoned with. The latest ascom driver set is solid and feature rich. The version 5 code in which Mr. Ward is testing will undoubtedly bring new features. Expected as soon as Feb 2011 I hear on the vine. Peter is on the inside so could advise realistic dates.

A few key points on the Titan;
  • Have the latest firmware eprom - don't dismiss the telescope's brains! It is after all a key aspect and perhaps just as important is the continual improvement program where software takes advantage of new features.
  • Ensure the mount is relatively well balanced. I found the a slight imbalance improve tracking performance.
  • To give your Titan more torque you can upgrade to the 50:1 gearbox, alternatively feed it 18v. It will love you for it slewing large scopes around with ease.
  • Gemini's in built pointing model is ok, however does not compare against a software pointing model such as Tpoint (far more terms). Depending on what you want achieve, the inbuilt pointing model may work well for you (keep in mind that operating remotely, the target needs to be dead center of the chip).
  • From a tracking performance perspective with PEC programmed, you will obtain excellent performance - on par with an AP900 - no problem.
  • Be mindful of cable tangle. The lugs that are used to secure polar alignment in azimuth can snag a cable. I've had a few 1m USB cables that are now 1.05m. They stretch to a point of destruction. Not a fun situation to be in while operating remotely and your guider stops working.
  • Check your worm clearance. If you do adjust make sure you compensate for expansion/contraction as the ambient air cools to avoid binding.
  • Perhaps more a Gemini point of interest, but set your east and west limits correctly. Not only will this save your precious OTA and camera hammering itself into the mount but also defines the meridian flip. For remote operations you can tweak the goto limit to fine tune (handy to say the least). You don't want to be wasting 20mins waiting for the mount to flip on an automated imaging run!
I'm sure I could think of a few other pointers on the mount, but overall its a strong performer for astro imaging work.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 19-11-2010, 08:08 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
Interesting thread with a variety of views. Good stuff!

Having owned a Losmandy Titan (regular, not 50:1 gearbox version) for a few years, I have to say that it is a very capable mount. Am sure Peter who purchased mine (noted in this thread) is now a happy camper. I found the mount worked very well for robotic operations having produced many images with it in this manner. However, don't be mistaken, its not a robotic mount. Mounts with absolute encoders offer true robotic operations having the ability to recover from a power outage. That said, if you ensure you "park" the mount each night after an imaging run has completed you can successfully power up, night after night, platesolve and continue imaging from where you last left off. However if you have a power outage during an imaging run (common in remote locations where dark skies exist I should add - talking from experience here!), the mount struggles and needs human intervention to keep the pointing aligned through regular syncs. If anything, the Gemini software is a force to be reckoned with. The latest ascom driver set is solid and feature rich. The version 5 code in which Mr. Ward is testing will undoubtedly bring new features. Expected as soon as Feb 2011 I hear on the vine. Peter is on the inside so could advise realistic dates.

A few key points on the Titan;
  • Have the latest firmware eprom - don't dismiss the telescope's brains! It is after all a key aspect and perhaps just as important is the continual improvement program where software takes advantage of new features.
  • Ensure the mount is relatively well balanced. I found the a slight imbalance improve tracking performance.
  • To give your Titan more torque you can upgrade to the 50:1 gearbox, alternatively feed it 18v. It will love you for it slewing large scopes around with ease.
  • Gemini's in built pointing model is ok, however does not compare against a software pointing model such as Tpoint (far more terms). Depending on what you want achieve, the inbuilt pointing model may work well for you (keep in mind that operating remotely, the target needs to be dead center of the chip).
  • From a tracking performance perspective with PEC programmed, you will obtain excellent performance - on par with an AP900 - no problem.
  • Be mindful of cable tangle. The lugs that are used to secure polar alignment in azimuth can snag a cable. I've had a few 1m USB cables that are now 1.05m. They stretch to a point of destruction. Not a fun situation to be in while operating remotely and your guider stops working.
  • Check your worm clearance. If you do adjust make sure you compensate for expansion/contraction as the ambient air cools to avoid binding.
  • Perhaps more a Gemini point of interest, but set your east and west limits correctly. Not only will this save your precious OTA and camera hammering itself into the mount but also defines the meridian flip. For remote operations you can tweak the goto limit to fine tune (handy to say the least). You don't want to be wasting 20mins waiting for the mount to flip on an automated imaging run!
I'm sure I could think of a few other pointers on the mount, but overall its a strong performer for astro imaging work.
thanks Jase, really great info and pointers which i am noting
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 19-11-2010, 08:57 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
have you considered the CGEPRO, l just watched a couple of videos on the Celestron site and it looks very good especially the new polar alignment method.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement