Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-10-2010, 11:57 AM
bartman's Avatar
bartman (Bart)
1 of 7 of 9

bartman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,968
moon sickle this morning

I took a few shots of the moon at about 1% waning crescent this morning
Hand held cause I didnt have time to set up the tripod ( I was at work and getting close to finishing my shift.)
iso 200, f5.6, 1/15s.
just a little levels adjustment.

Wish I had time.....

Bartman
PS question: why does the size of this photo in explorer say 204kb and now posted it says 58.5kb?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (moon-sickle-DSC0350.jpg)
58.5 KB125 views
Click for full-size image (_DSC0347 copy.jpg)
99.2 KB142 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-10-2010, 12:10 PM
cookie8's Avatar
cookie8 (Vincent)
Hooked since Halley's

cookie8 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Baulkham Hills,NSW
Posts: 790
Wow. This is the thinnest moon I,ve ever seen. What time was it taken? It could be a record oldest moon ever captured.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2010, 01:10 PM
bartman's Avatar
bartman (Bart)
1 of 7 of 9

bartman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,968
twas about 05:28....
Record? Really?.....( scuse the ignorance ... but why?http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/....s/sad_eyes.gif)
Wicked!
It was hard to see visually, but once I spotted it, thought about it for a few secs- thinking I wont be quick enough or the camera hand held wont take the shot- but did it anyway.
I'm wondering if someone could get more detail out of it from the original pic?
Thanks
Bartman
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2010, 02:40 PM
StephenM's Avatar
StephenM (Stephen)
Registered User

StephenM is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,399
That is a great result for hand-held! Nice work. I also had a quick look at about 5:10am, with the idea of capturing an image or 2, but couldn't find the Moon due to thin cloud.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bartman View Post
PS question: why does the size of this photo in explorer say 204kb and now posted it says 58.5kb?
I think the max size allowed is 200 kb, and images larger than this are resized during the uploading process.

Cheers,
Stephen
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2010, 02:57 PM
bartman's Avatar
bartman (Bart)
1 of 7 of 9

bartman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,968
Thanks Stephen!, now that I know it might be a rare pic I am all the more happier.

Still a little baffled about the picture size. The second pic comes up as 100 kb ( in explorer) and shows up as ~100 kb in the post. I used Picasa this time.
And if pics are over 200 kb and are reduced ...then why do I see some posts ( including some of my own..) at more than 200 kb in the preview section?

Strange....
Bartman
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-10-2010, 02:22 AM
michaellxv's Avatar
michaellxv (Michael)
Registered User

michaellxv is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 1,581
Nice moon.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-10-2010, 02:38 AM
bartman's Avatar
bartman (Bart)
1 of 7 of 9

bartman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,968
TY Michael!
Its faint, but its there....
Bartman
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement