Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 21-09-2010, 09:25 PM
Yoddha's Avatar
Yoddha
Registered User

Yoddha is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 398
A kind of widefield in M11 area

This is my first attempt to image with the little friend WO ZS-66SD. So far I used as a finder, widefield and travel scope, hope soon the get is main assignment - guide scope. Few months ago I cut a Bahtinov mask for it, which was very challenging, but so far in the field I always was in favor of its bigger brother ZS-110

Last time I was in the nearby mountain the weather was not good at all and decided to point the small one to that part of the sky which was free of clouds. Luckily it was my back-up target for the night - M11. Looks like I will start a quest for WO FF-II because FF-III can't manage all the curvature.

So here are M11, NGC6704, most of the dark nebula Barnard 104 (the L-shape one) and a portion of Milky Way

Click image for larger version

Name:	M11_2_mask_2_2_small_t.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	210.1 KB
ID:	82339

A bigger version can be found at : http://www.ideiki.com/astro/astroima...contrast_t.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-09-2010, 07:48 PM
David Fitz-Henr's Avatar
David Fitz-Henr
Registered User

David Fitz-Henr is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bowen Mountain
Posts: 837
Nice wide field image Ivo - Barnard 104 stands out quite well! It may be worth varying the spacing between the FF-III and the imaging chip to see if you can reduce the field curvature before buying an FF-II. I achieved very good results doing this with a Televue Paracorr.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-09-2010, 10:00 PM
Yoddha's Avatar
Yoddha
Registered User

Yoddha is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 398
Thank you David! How long spacer you use?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-09-2010, 10:08 PM
David Fitz-Henr's Avatar
David Fitz-Henr
Registered User

David Fitz-Henr is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bowen Mountain
Posts: 837
Well, I added about 3mm extra distance to the recommended value of 55mm (giving 58mm total) - however, the optical properties of the Paracorr may be different to the WO FF-III. The problem may be that you might need to reduce the space between the FF-III and the chip. Looking at the distortion in the corners I suspect that this may be the case (which may not be so easy).

Last edited by David Fitz-Henr; 22-09-2010 at 10:09 PM. Reason: correction
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-09-2010, 12:54 AM
Yoddha's Avatar
Yoddha
Registered User

Yoddha is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 398
Thanks again! Will search the net for more info about the distortions. BTW FFII are so rare that there is no hurry
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement