ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waxing Gibbous 76%
|
|

10-01-2006, 10:05 PM
|
 |
Evolution in action.
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sheffield Tasmania
Posts: 108
|
|
GSO 10" Deluxe vs GSO 12" Ltd
My telescope procrastination is almost over. It's down to either of the above 2 scopes. There is $100 difference between the 10" Deluxe and the 12" Limited GSO dobs.
Given the deluxe has a fan, a crayford focuser and better glass for the main mirror, in the considered wisdom of this group would the better features of the 10" be worth sacrificing for the extra aperture of the 12" with the $100 difference going into better EP selection?
My inclination is to go with the 10" after all I have read in the forums here. Thoughts anyone?
Last edited by lost_in_space; 10-01-2006 at 10:10 PM.
Reason: Spulling Irror
|

10-01-2006, 10:14 PM
|
 |
Sir Post a Lot!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
|
|
You don't mention 12" deluxe!
It's a tough choice.. aperture rules, so I'd go the 12", and then spend $99 extra ontop to get the GS crayford put on. You don't need to worry about the fan just yet, although it's handy to have.
As long as the 12" is portable enough for you, moving in and out of the house, to and from dark skies etc, you'll love the aperture!
|

10-01-2006, 10:14 PM
|
 |
Planet photographer
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
|
|
Hmmm...I don't know all the specs on the 2 in question. Seeing aperture is supposedly king, I think for an extra $100 for 2 more inches would temp me.
Doesn't the 12" come standard with a crayford these days?
|

10-01-2006, 10:21 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
|
|
Go the 12". Aperture upgrading is the most expensive item, focusers..fans.. add them as you can.
|

10-01-2006, 10:22 PM
|
 |
<><><><>
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
|
|
Go with apature you can always build on it.
|

10-01-2006, 10:25 PM
|
 |
aiming for 2nd Halley's
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
|
|
I reckon you''l be happy with either... if I were starting out myself I'd take the 10in because I'm lazy and I'd want to make sure size didn't put me off carting it around and using it.
good luck
|

10-01-2006, 10:26 PM
|
 |
Vagabond
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: China
Posts: 1,477
|
|
G,day
A telescope will work fine with out a crayford focuser or a cooling fan so I would go for the 300mm Dob.
|

10-01-2006, 10:30 PM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
It is well worth paying the extra for the 12" but get it with the Crayford!!!! Pay the extra for it.
Don't worry about the fan. One can be fitted any time, they are only 12v computer fans.
As for the quality of glass, because we don't get down to minus 15 degrees any of the optical glasses will do. Plate Glass, BK7, or Pyrex. With Australias weather you will never see any difference between them. But if you are worried about using Plate Glass, the 12" deluxe has BK7 Glass, and the fan already fitted. And a Crayford Focuser!
Look down the bottom of the page on this link and you will see:
Guan Sheng GS-980-BK7-CRF
$999.00 AUD
BK7 = BK7 Optical Glass (good stuff) CRF = Crayford Focuser (lovely)
http://www.andrewscom.com.au/site-co...-dobsonian.htm
p.s. I'm not saying this just because I own a 12" Deluxe. It's because they are a good buy! And coz I own one!
I will mark 12" in your poll, but recommend you get the Deluxe!
|

10-01-2006, 10:31 PM
|
 |
Evolution in action.
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sheffield Tasmania
Posts: 108
|
|
The 12" Deluxe will push me over my budget with the other kit I am buying. It's tempting though. Freight is the same for 10" and 12" to Tassie. I am not frightened of getting the basic model and modding it to my requirements though, in fact I am planning some serious mods anyway.
Bugga, you guys are supposed to be helping me, and now you are making me change my mind all over again
Seriously though, I appreciate the comments so keep 'em coming, and WILL make a decision in the next couple of days.
|

10-01-2006, 10:41 PM
|
 |
Plays well with others!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
|
|
Without knowing you physical size, vehicle and how far from dark skies I will error on the side caution...get the 10 inch deluxe and put the extra $100 toward a quality widefield eyepiece...
Yes, "size" does rule but I reckon you will enjoy looking through a better eyepiece or two as much as the extra light...the 10 inch maybe a little easier to handle and the "deluxe" stuff (crayford and fan) are things you are ultiimately going to modify up to sometime anyway...
My 2 cents...
|

10-01-2006, 10:44 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
|
|
If transportation is not an issue (when you want to take it to darker skies), then get the 12". There is a big difference in this regard between the 10 & 12". As far as the extras go, Crayford, fan, ... you can always get these later as more funds become available.
|

10-01-2006, 10:51 PM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
Yeah, after a bit of thought it would be cheaper to get the standard 12" at $799 and buy a Crayford Focuser at $99 and fit it yourself! All up it is $100 cheaper than the Deluxe and you still get an excellent 12".
The difference between a 10" and 12" isn't just 2" either. There is a mathematical way to work out the extra surface area (light gathering power) but I don't know it. But it is quite a big difference!
|

10-01-2006, 10:55 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
|
|
Go the 12 inch, the other niceties such as fans and crayford, you can add later for not much extra cost (just over 100 recession riddled buckazoids). On the other hand the 10 inch can't easily (or cheaply) be made into a 12.....and the 12 inch has 44% more light gathering area than the 10 inch....
|

10-01-2006, 10:55 PM
|
 |
1300 THESKY
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cairns Qld
Posts: 2,405
|
|
I have the 10" Dob, but so long as you can transport it, go the 12"
Remember the #1 Rule: Aperture rules !
When you are trying to tease detail out of the humonculus nebula, or see the Spiral arms of NGC 1365 etc etc ... you will be glad of the extra aperture !
|

10-01-2006, 10:58 PM
|
 |
Canon collector
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Taylors Lakes Melb
Posts: 1,965
|
|
yes i agree with steve . go aperture 12" focusers and stuff can be put on later BUT if you go 10" then go SAXON cause SAXONS RULE!!!!!!!!!!............
|

10-01-2006, 10:59 PM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
Does anyone know the formula for working out the extra % surface area between a 10" & 12" mirror?
|

10-01-2006, 11:03 PM
|
 |
Evolution in action.
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sheffield Tasmania
Posts: 108
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ballaratdragons
Don't worry about the fan. One can be fitted any time, they are only 12v computer fans.
As for the quality of glass, because we don't get down to minus 15 degrees any of the optical glasses will do. Plate Glass, BK7, or Pyrex. With Australias weather you will never see any difference between them. But if you are worried about using Plate Glass, the 12" deluxe has BK7 Glass, and the fan already fitted. And a Crayford Focuser!
|
The fan is not really an issue, as I am a computer tech. Temperature may be an issue though, it can get down to -5 here on a clear winter night, and has gone as low as -9.
|

10-01-2006, 11:04 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
|
|
Daniel, I know you like the altitude motion tensioner adjustment, but is there anything else about Saxon Dobs that RULEs over GSO Dobs?
|

10-01-2006, 11:05 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
|
|
pi r squared gives the area Ken but if it's a percentage comparison you can forget pi. Work it out like this. 10 inch (250mm) is 125x125=15625. 12 inch (300mm) is 150x150=22500 Difference is (22500-15625)/15625 which is 44%.
|

10-01-2006, 11:16 PM
|
 |
Canon collector
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Taylors Lakes Melb
Posts: 1,965
|
|
Sorry to go off the topic but i had a giggle imagining all you GS owners must have read that and simultaneously went  in unicen!!!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:11 PM.
|
|