ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waning Crescent 13.1%
|
|

12-07-2010, 11:14 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
|
|
Veil nebula
I had a ... very quick look the other night for this supernova remnant in Cygnus, with no luck, but was incoming cloud alert.
Is this difficult to see?
Which filter is best .... 0111?
Which EP - I would think a wider view would be best ie .... 32mm??
Any tips.
Last edited by Liz; 12-07-2010 at 12:54 PM.
|

12-07-2010, 11:22 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: moonee beach
Posts: 2,179
|
|
hi liz
i was thinking a h-beta i read it somewhere i while ago and yes a nice low power wide eyepiece.
|

12-07-2010, 12:09 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: moonee beach
Posts: 2,179
|
|
my appologize liz a OIII and a uhc will show more remnants of the veil the cocoon neb is better with the h-beta.i was miles away when posting before
|

12-07-2010, 01:22 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,244
|
|
It is difficult but not impossible.
The object is large and is split into two halves; east and west. An O-III filter on a 32 or 40mm eyepiece is best but note to get a complete half with a typical Dob Newt of say 1500mm f.l. you will need a 2" low power wide field eyepiece and 2" filter for better framing of the object. A dark sky is highly recommended too. Find the star 52 Cyg and you should see one half of the nebula with an O-III filter and low power. A 6" Newt is more than enough to spot it.
|

12-07-2010, 01:35 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mozzie
my appologize liz a OIII and a uhc will show more remnants of the veil the cocoon neb is better with the h-beta.i was miles away when posting before
|
ta Peter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by astro744
It is difficult but not impossible.
The object is large and is split into two halves; east and west. An O-III filter on a 32 or 40mm eyepiece is best but note to get a complete half with a typical Dob Newt of say 1500mm f.l. you will need a 2" low power wide field eyepiece and 2" filter for better framing of the object. A dark sky is highly recommended too. Find the star 52 Cyg and you should see one half of the nebula with an O-III filter and low power. A 6" Newt is more than enough to spot it.
|
thank you astro .... well, have an O-111, and a 32mm (though not 2"), so will line up on star 52 Cyg Sat night, and voila!!
|

12-07-2010, 02:02 PM
|
 |
The Wanderer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dumaguete Philippines
Posts: 757
|
|
Hi, a filter will make it better but with our 8" LightBridge at 40x it was visible sans filter. Certainly not all the time but it is doable. Dark skies, no high thin for it to hide in and it comes into direct vision observing.
Brian
|

12-07-2010, 05:20 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian W
Hi, a filter will make it better but with our 8" LightBridge at 40x it was visible sans filter. Certainly not all the time but it is doable. Dark skies, no high thin for it to hide in and it comes into direct vision observing.
Brian
|
Thanks Brian ... heres hoping for VERY clear skies.
|

12-07-2010, 05:38 PM
|
 |
Fast Scope & Fast Engine
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Broken Hill N.S.W
Posts: 3,305
|
|
Liz search your star maps for 52 cygni a bright star right alongside it and wham it will be there with and without a OIII but the filter is far better.
Cheers Kev.
|

13-07-2010, 12:59 AM
|
 |
Searching for Travolta...
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 3,700
|
|
Hi Liz,
Have a look at this great link written by David Knisley- aside from a very informative read regarding the use of filters, it also tells you which filter is best suited for each object.
http:////pages.sbcglobal.net/raycash/filters.htm
Happy viewing of the Veil Neb! (Haven't seen this one myself yet).
|

13-07-2010, 09:23 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
|
|
I've spotted the Veil through binos , holding a UHC filter in front of one of the lenses. (Why? because I wanted to see if it was possible)
It really is quite a large object. Once tracked down with a wide field ep, it's great to explore the finer detail using a 12mm. So much detail!!!
It's one of the most beautiful objects in the sky.
|

13-07-2010, 09:55 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjnettie
I've spotted the Veil through binos , holding a UHC filter in front of one of the lenses. (Why? because I wanted to see if it was possible)
It really is quite a large object. Once tracked down with a wide field ep, it's great to explore the finer detail using a 12mm. So much detail!!!
It's one of the most beautiful objects in the sky.
|
Wow!!! Thats great jjj.
Thanks Suzy - will have a read of that, and think I have read some of his stuff on filters before .... but have forgotton it all.
Thanks Kev - yes, that little star seems to be the secret.
|

13-07-2010, 10:13 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
|
|
Thats a great article by David Kingley, Suzy - love the section on all the nebulas and which filter is best.
UHC is the overall filter winner.
And ....
VEIL NEBULA NGC 6960-95 (SNR in Cygnus)
(10 inch f/5.6, 52x).
DEEP-SKY: (3) Nebula is easier to see than without a filter, with both sides of the loop being visible, including the section through 52 Cygni.
UHC: (4) Large increase in detail and contrast! Nebula really stands out with some filamentary detail. Hints of other strands in the interior of the loop.
OIII: (5) ENORMOUS INCREASE IN CONTRAST AND DETAIL with wonderful fine filaments and strands visible even between the two main arcs, making the entire complex closely resemble its photograph. OIII is the filter of choice here.
H-BETA: (1) Very dim, but still visible (forget it!).
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR VEIL: OIII/UHC (OIII is somewhat better but H-BETA is
NOT recommended).
Last edited by Liz; 14-07-2010 at 08:18 AM.
|

13-07-2010, 08:53 PM
|
 |
Fast Scope & Fast Engine
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Broken Hill N.S.W
Posts: 3,305
|
|
Tell us how you go now Liz ?
Did ya observe it.
Cheers Kev.
|

14-07-2010, 08:18 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevnool
Tell us how you go now Liz ?
Did ya observe it.
Cheers Kev.
|
Will do Kev .... Saturday night is the go.
|

14-07-2010, 09:46 AM
|
 |
Supernova Searcher
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
|
|
I spent some time last night observing the Veil Nebula using a University Optics 55mm Eyepiece (33xmag)16" scope.
Transparency and Seeing was quite reasonable both about 7-10, 10 being best.
I used both O111 and UHC filters.
The eyepiece gives an area of about one and a half degrees
The Nebula was visible without filter but was not pronounced but was still easy to see.
The O111 filter really brought the nebula to life though dulling the stars, but still a splendid sight.
The UHC filter gave the most pleasing view as it did not darken the sky so much and the star's where still bright and the nebula was very crisp .
I had to blink the eyepieces with the filters as my filters are only 1.25" not
2".
I used to get good views of the Veil with my 8" SCT but have not used it on this object for a long time
|

14-07-2010, 10:02 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron
I spent some time last night observing the Veil Nebula using a University Optics 55mm Eyepiece (33xmag)16" scope.
Transparency and Seeing was quite reasonable both about 7-10, 10 being best.
I used both O111 and UHC filters.
The eyepiece gives an area of about one and a half degrees
The Nebula was visible without filter but was not pronounced but was still easy to see.
The O111 filter really brought the nebula to life though dulling the stars, but still a splendid sight.
The UHC filter gave the most pleasing view as it did not darken the sky so much and the star's where still bright and the nebula was very crisp .
I had to blink the eyepieces with the filters as my filters are only 1.25" not
2".
I used to get good views of the Veil with my 8" SCT but have not used it on this object for a long time 
|
Wow, that is great!! Thanks Ron. 
Ooh, a 55mm EP, may have to upgrade my EPs ... 
Have both those filters, cant wait to give it a go.
|

14-07-2010, 01:28 PM
|
 |
Supernova Searcher
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
|
|
Liz, with the Veil transiting at about 01:40 and nearly 40deg altitude in your location, you should get a much better view than us observers further south 
I look forward to your report soon
|

14-07-2010, 02:13 PM
|
 |
Searching for Travolta...
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 3,700
|
|
Yes, please Liz, give us an observation report.
|

18-07-2010, 10:24 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
|
|
The Veil conquered!!
We had an excellent night up here viewing .... once the Moon sunk behind the trees.
Once Cygnus had risen a bit, I pointed the scope to 52 Cygni with my 15mm, scanned around area with no result, so changed too 32mm televue plossl. Scanning, but still not seeing anything. In the meantime, others around me were finding it ... bugger .... checked through their scopes to see how it looked, then back to mine, and there it was!!
Probably expecting more, but when you first see something it may seem faint, then the more you look, the more prominent it becomes. 
Popped in the UHC which helped a little, then the O-111 which improved it a bit again. Kept on looking and trolling around the area,and more the remnant was becoming visible, very beautiful!!! Its covers such a large area, with quite a few large wispy threads.
Mission accomplished, thank you all. 
Also had a quick look at North American Nebula near Deneb in Cygnus, its was a lot fainter, but still got it.
|

18-07-2010, 10:35 AM
|
 |
The Wanderer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dumaguete Philippines
Posts: 757
|
|
Hi Liz, as an alien female you may not be familiar with the human concept of flirting. The first rule is to never make direct eye contact... or at least not until you have seriously noticed each other.
Also as an alien it might be that you are not aware that the veil is and was used to hide and entice.
Many have found that flirting works and patience is almost always rewarded.
Brian
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:14 AM.
|
|