Thanks everyone for your kind words and encouragement. I was pretty excited how this one was coming out in the end and wanted to share. There's always the worry when you've spent a few hours on something and its late that you'll find fault in the morning - couldn't help putting it up though as it stood, and I was particularly pleased at some of the detail I was able to pull out of the central "face" of the Lagoon.
David - as far as PixInsight processing went:
- RGB combine processed first - DBE, Colour Cal, Histogram stretches, Curves for bit of contract and Saturation boost and relative colour tweaks. Didn't seem to need noise reduction
(would have like to do some wavelet transforms for the bright central areas, but I still can't bend them enough to my will!)
- L stack: Deconv with the PSF skewed and rotated a bit to correct for some tracking smearing, Histogram stretch
- Ha images stacked, Histogram stretch, and slight denoise (ACDNR)
- StarAlignment, Crop
- Over to PS to layer RGB, L and Ha
- Then some stretches, Shadows/Highlights, High Pass filter masking and saturation boosting ala Ken Crawford's excellent suggestions:
http://www.imagingdeepsky.com/Presentations.html
I was particularly excited by Ken's use of Shadow/Highlights in PS to control blown out highlight areas - I've only ever used it to boost faint areas in the past. Ideally would have liked to do more of the final processing in PI but I'm still climbing the steep learning curve!
Phil - nowhere near the time you spent on that beautiful Rho Oph mosaic. I'm sorry now I didn't spend more time chatting and learning, but 3 days/nights goes so fast, and getting a look at your gear in action was great. Point taken re saturation - in hindsight I've pushed too hard - even the thumbnails look a bit overdone really
Trevor - interesting comparison with the RCOS. I was worried about the quality of the flats on this one and thought the data was a lot poorer until I got well into it. My image doesn't have that same RCOS razor blade sharpness, but I'm very happy how the little Newt + MPCC holds up in general!
Paul - many thanks - agreed on Saturation - just because PI has a nice saturation curve function, I shouldn't abuse it....
Many thanks again everyone who has looked/replied - really appreciate your comments,
Rob