Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-05-2010, 11:16 AM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
IC2944 Ha DSLR

Hello all,
Clear night last night, so managed to grab some more Ha data of IC2944 - the Running Chicken Nebula.

Not happy with all subs due to focus slip through session (had to bin 3/9) - my own fault...I'm going to stick up a big sign somewhere to remind me - focus,focus,FOCUS!!!!!

Canon 40D (modded)
Canon 300mm f4L IS lens @f4
Astronomik 12nm EOS clip in Ha filter
16 x 15min subs (4 hours total), iso1600, ICNR
HEQ5 Pro mount
Images Plus, PS CS4

Higher Res...
http://s327.photobucket.com/albums/k...urrent=9aa.jpg

Hope to eventually blend this data with some RGB once the moon allows!

Cheers
Doug


Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IC2944-lo-res.jpg)
198.3 KB71 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2010, 12:59 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
It's fairly dim in parts especailly collecting Ha so great work Dougie
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2010, 02:06 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
It's fairly dim in parts especailly collecting Ha so great work Dougie
Bringing out contrast in area round Bok globules was hardest - that area is burned out in Ha!!
Cheers Trevor
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2010, 04:38 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
This year seems to be one for the chook!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-05-2010, 06:16 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Nice work Doug, supprising what can be done with DSLR and stock lens. Focus looks good to me, and guiding is smick. Very low noise for 15min subs at 1600 ISO with ICNR too, amazing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:00 PM
David Fitz-Henr's Avatar
David Fitz-Henr
Registered User

David Fitz-Henr is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bowen Mountain
Posts: 837
That's a great image Doug, good detail - and considering that you did it with a DSLR and telephoto lens! Great stuff!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:13 PM
Craig_L
Craig

Craig_L is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 558
Nice detail Doug. Hmmm. That's 8 hours with ICNR. Be good to see it with the RGB soon.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:38 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Looks great. Amazing work with a DSLR. I agree with Fred - focus is spot on and you have remarkably very little noise. The only thing to get it smoother would be to lower the blackpoint a bit I reckon. Top work though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:47 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Thanks all - but I felt there was something poor about this one.
I went back and looked at all the 16 subs and dumped 10 of them due to bad focus. So this will hopefully be a work in progress and I can post something better soon.
On the upside, I got to grips with Shadows/Highlights for bringing out hidden contrast detail whilst doing this image.

To illustrate, I've posted a crop of one of the original Ha subs.

Off topic - As Craig mentions, although 4 hours of data - the ICNR really meant 8 hrs capture time! This I think ties in with the ongoing DSLR v's CCD debate - the much longer subs needed to get passable Ha response from the DSLR means that they're open to tracking/focus errors. And it often shows!! When a 15min shot takes 30mins in the DSLR I may need to check focus after each shot!!! Gawd!
Doug
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (focus.jpg)
197.0 KB21 views
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-05-2010, 08:31 PM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Emerald, QLD
Posts: 564
That's a pretty impressive image cycle there Doug, 15min light followed by a 15min ICNR. A significant amount of data, but to have all those soft subs mixed in there must have been rather frustrating. Also, to be taking 15min subs @ ISO1600, you do a top job of processing a smooth image in the end - roll on the RGB data As per usual, nice work.

Michael
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-05-2010, 02:24 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt View Post
That's a pretty impressive image cycle there Doug, 15min light followed by a 15min ICNR. A significant amount of data, but to have all those soft subs mixed in there must have been rather frustrating. Also, to be taking 15min subs @ ISO1600, you do a top job of processing a smooth image in the end - roll on the RGB data As per usual, nice work.

Michael
Cheers Michael - yes, the out of focus subs are a pain. But, I've only got myself to blame. I'll be checking focus more thoroughly in future.
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-05-2010, 03:20 PM
telecasterguru's Avatar
telecasterguru (Frank)
Have scope will travel!

telecasterguru is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pitnacree NSW
Posts: 1,501
Doug,

Really good job but 8 hours of capture is a lot of work.

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-05-2010, 06:16 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Hi Doug,

Very nice capture.

Any reason you are using ICNR instead of dark subtraction?

When I used a DLSR I made a dark library for different ISOs and times and then made a master dark. With Images Plus and CCDstack you can use adaptive darks and the software adjusts for different levels of noise from different temps and does a very good job at it.

So it would save a lot of time and you could use that extra time for more exposures.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-05-2010, 06:24 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
CCD stack was a nightmare with DSLR subs, I was forced to go back to IP for DSLR pics, but the latest version (just out) seems to handle large pics/stacks much better, and then yes, the adaptive dark feature works very well.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-05-2010, 06:25 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
Nice work there doug, as a fellow 40d user i know that Ha can be a royal pain, and with a little apereature it can be very hard.!

what was the ambient temperature that you where shooting in?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-05-2010, 08:20 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by telecasterguru View Post
Doug,

Really good job but 8 hours of capture is a lot of work.

Frank
Cheers Mr Guru - keeps me off the streets!

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Hi Doug,

Very nice capture.

Any reason you are using ICNR instead of dark subtraction?

When I used a DLSR I made a dark library for different ISOs and times and then made a master dark. With Images Plus and CCDstack you can use adaptive darks and the software adjusts for different levels of noise from different temps and does a very good job at it.

So it would save a lot of time and you could use that extra time for more exposures.

Greg.
ICNR by force of habit and not possessing a darks library. But your reasoning obviously makes sense. All my images are becoming sagas, so I'm going to look into the darks library thing - I'll check out the adaptive dark feature in IP . Thanks for the info.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
CCD stack was a nightmare with DSLR subs, I was forced to go back to IP for DSLR pics, but the latest version (just out) seems to handle large pics/stacks much better, and then yes, the adaptive dark feature works very well.
Cheers Fred

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmitchell82 View Post
Nice work there doug, as a fellow 40d user i know that Ha can be a royal pain, and with a little apereature it can be very hard.!

what was the ambient temperature that you where shooting in?
Not too sure mate - reckon around 8 degrees maybe.
Ha isn't the easiest on a DSLR that's for sure - checking focus between each shot in the absence of a bright star in the FOV is going to be a nachtmare!!!!
I developed a little routine to help with the "user" program of Synscan which makes life a tad easier (just a tad mind!!) Find a bright star without Ha filter - set it as user object 1. GoTo and Frame the object you want to image - set it as user object 2. Go back to obj 1 (bright star), insert Ha filter into imaging train, focus, slew back to obj 2 - start imaging!!!! Simple Eh!?
The bugger is that if you use this to method to focus in-between shots, you stuff around with the guiding a bit too much.
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-05-2010, 01:36 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
ahhh thats why your noise was at a minimum. i have found the magic temp for the dslr to start working better is about 10deg. by the time you get to 5 deg, its humming and when you hit your zeroish deg iso 800+ becomes reality!

As for capture in ha i go the route of using Maximdl, its very accrate and easy to use with its... move scope here function. that is for the start of the night, i hit calibrate, it takes 3 images finding the arc per pixel and the sensor details from the camera.

Making sure the polar alignment is spot on, i then do a star sync close by generally on a bright star, and while im there I focus in the ha tuned dslr, then i progressively get closer to the object, and if its particularly faint ill do a triangle around it. then goto that location, take a photo of about 30 seconds, use pinpointLE to resolve the image, this then puts a overlay of your image on the planetarium prog giving the angle/size and exact location. you know exactly where you sit!

From there its a matter of flipping back to a bright star somewhere in the area focus every few hours. and maxim will bring you virtually back to the same spot again! and you can also center it with the same function i said before. right click, point scope here. No more fiddling like a lerner driver trying to get it centered correctly!

Im currently working on a Ha mosaic of the lagoon area with a 40x60 minute panel 10"+40d and its looking very smooth of late! ill send you a link once i finish it hopefully this weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-05-2010, 01:45 PM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,639
Lovely work Doug !
Looking forward to more.

You've got a nice combination there, a mod 40D and the 300mm L f4.

I'm looking forward to trying some Ha imaging myself soon.

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-05-2010, 06:49 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Nice field of view Doug. When you make that sticker for yourself please make another for me. I suffer the same pain regularly.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-05-2010, 01:17 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmitchell82 View Post
Im currently working on a Ha mosaic of the lagoon area with a 40x60 minute panel 10"+40d and its looking very smooth of late! ill send you a link once i finish it hopefully this weekend.
Look forward to that one Brendan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement