Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-02-2010, 03:25 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,268
NGC 2818 A planetary within a cluster within the Compass

Target: NGC 2818, NGC2818A

Camera: Canon 350d modified, CLS clip filter
Exposure Capture: DLSR Focus,
Scope: GSO CF RC200
EFR: f/8
Mount: EQ6 Pro
Exposure Setting: Prime focus, @ ISO800 ICNR off Custom WB
Exposures: 10 @ 360s lights taken between 8:00 and 12:00pm total 60 min 12/02/2010
Seeing: no moon, slight wind,
Guiding: Orion Starshoot Autoguider using PHD with ED80
Focus: DSLR Focus Bahitov mask
Stacking: DSS 5 darks no flats
Processing: PS CS3,


NGC 2818 Observation data

(Epoch J2000.0 [1]) Right ascension 09h 16m 01.656s [1] Declination -36° 37′ 38.76″ [1] Distance 10,400 ly [2] Apparent dimensions (V) 2' [2] Constellation Pyxis Physical characteristics Radius 3.25 ly [2] Other designations NGC 2818[1], PLN 261+8.1[2] See also: Planetary nebula, Lists of nebulae

NGC 2818 is a planetary nebula located in the southern constellation Pyxis (The Compass). This spectacular nebula consists largely of glowing gases from the star's outer layers ejected during the final stages of its life when it had run out of the fuel necessary to sustain its core fusion processes. The remnants of its core will carry on as a white dwarf. [3]
It is often cited as a member of the open cluster framing it, however, radial velocity differences between the planetary nebula and open cluster suggest a chance alignment. The case is yet another example of a superposed pair, joining the famed case of NGC 2438 and M46.
Partly because of their small total mass, open clusters have relatively poor gravitational cohesion. Consequently, open clusters tend to disperse after a relatively short time, typically some 10 million years, because of external gravitational influences amid other factors. Under exceptional conditions, open clusters can remain intact for up to 100 million years.
Theoretical models predict that planetary nebulae can form from main-sequence stars of between 8 and 1 solar masses, which puts their age at 40 million years and older. Although there are a few hundred known open clusters within that age range, a variety of reasons limit the chances of finding a member of an open cluster in a planetary nebula phase. One such reason is that the planetary nebula phase for more massive stars belonging to younger clusters is on the order of thousands of years - a blink of the eye in cosmic terms. To date, no true association has been established between open clusters and planetary nebulae.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc2818 1hr 10f cs3 max msa.jpg)
153.0 KB82 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-02-2010, 03:32 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
Wow! Very nice again Trev. Great details and colors in the small planetary.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-02-2010, 02:02 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
A very nice capture Trevor, nice colour and detail in this one.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-02-2010, 02:49 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Geez talk about tiny!! Good work capturing something so small mate.. Given its size, it would be a single pixel in my setup! hahaha!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-02-2010, 08:04 AM
telecasterguru's Avatar
telecasterguru (Frank)
Have scope will travel!

telecasterguru is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pitnacree NSW
Posts: 1,501
Trevor,

Wonderful PN. Looks to be early stage. Great capture.

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-02-2010, 08:35 AM
Tom Davis's Avatar
Tom Davis (Tom)
Registered User

Tom Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Inkom, ID USA
Posts: 589
Beautiful! I love the FOV!!

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-02-2010, 11:02 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,268
Thanks for the feedback Marc, Ric, Alex, Frank and Tom

these planetary's are small but quite interesting IMO

such a small scope doesn't really do them justice something around 17" and 3m focal length probably could
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-02-2010, 10:00 PM
Jim McAloon
Registered User

Jim McAloon is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13
That's lovely, Trevor. I observed this one visually about ten days ago, plain and distinct in my 12 inch Newt - but of course all gray!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-02-2010, 12:04 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,268
Thanks Jim and welcome
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement