Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-02-2010, 06:50 PM
Jarvamundo (Alex)
Registered User

Jarvamundo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 406
Merging Galaxies Create Binary Quasars

http://www.ciw.edu/news/merging_gala..._binary_quasar

wow...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-02-2010, 10:13 PM
Jarvamundo (Alex)
Registered User

Jarvamundo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 406
hahaha wow... someones tweaked on that quasars hanging around galaxies means redshift does not equal velocity.... these objects should be seperated by lightyears! hahah...

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Qu...ision_999.html

the headline just changed!

The original headline created by the Magellan Telescopes Website (i posted) is now being changed! now 6hrs ago..

wow.... the results are meeting the theory now...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-02-2010, 10:28 PM
Jarvamundo (Alex)
Registered User

Jarvamundo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 406
hmm maybe changed to "captured" as in film...

hmmm just went from "Create" to "Captured"...

but the article says "triggerd"

what does "triggered" mean...

Quote:
This result represents strong evidence for the prediction that a pair of quasars would be triggered during a merger. The galaxy disks both appear to be nearly face-on to Earth, which may explain why the X-rays from Chandra show no signs of absorption by intervening gas or dust.
hmmm bizarre
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2010, 10:58 PM
Jarvamundo (Alex)
Registered User

Jarvamundo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 406
Quote:
This composite image shows the effects of two galaxies caught in the act of merging. A Chandra X-ray Observatory image shows a pair of quasars in blue, located about 4.6 billion light years away, but separated on the sky by only about 70 thousand light years.

Sorry but isnt the image in the second article simply a copy of the optical one from the Magellan Website?

It's got nothing to do with Chandra X- rays yeah? Why is the second article only mentioning the Chandra Scientist and not the Astronomer who made the discovery.... they are 2 seperate organisations?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-02-2010, 12:44 PM
Jarvamundo (Alex)
Registered User

Jarvamundo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 406
Xray, Optical and composites available here: http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2010/sdss/
facinating
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement