Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-01-2010, 06:41 AM
Doodles23's Avatar
Doodles23 (Dave Bleser)
Wannabe Australian

Doodles23 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 107
Mars over Miami 2: use 12 bits or 8 bits?

As Trevor and my wife Gail pointed out, my Jan 20th image made Mars look like it is laying on a slab in the morgue. So I redid a set of 1500 frames taken at 30fps using the 12 bit mode of my new Dragonfly2 camera. This is the image on the left. Does this image capture more detail than the image on the right which was from a set of 1500 frames at 60 fps (8 bit)? Maybe. Maybe not. You be the judge.

The awful color was the result of a Photoshop screw-up. Now things are under better control. I would like somebody's opinion on whether it makes sense to use 12 bits @ 30fps vs 8 bits @ 60fps under average seeing with a bright planet? I am under the assumption that the larger grey palette at 12 bits only becomes important with dimmer images that will have to undergo stretching.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Mars 1.20.2010.jpg)
8.6 KB51 views
Click for full-size image (Mars LG.2009.01.20.jpg)
56.9 KB42 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-01-2010, 11:48 AM
Quark's Avatar
Quark (Trevor)
Registered User

Quark is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,110
Hi Dave & Gail,

I reckon the colour is an improvement, as for the difference in detail, frankly they look the same to me. The detail in your new attempt looks slightly sharper, but it is at a smaller image scale.

Any image will look better resolved at a lesser image scale.
I think Bird or Paul would be the ones to talk about the pro's and con's of 12 bit & 8 bit but I recall Bird saying that he was going to be away for a while.

Regards
Trevor
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-01-2010, 01:12 AM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Hi Dave, nice work

I always use 12 bit on my lu075m with Lucan recorder/

For my 10" scope, 30 fps is a nice rate to get the data down the pipe and record roughly 35 seconds each channel at good histogram exposures.

Cant say I can really point to a good example where 8 bit is compared to 12 bit, but in theory, you should get a better result due to the number of gray scales/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement