Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-01-2010, 11:51 AM
Dennis79 (Keith)
Registered User

Dennis79 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toowoomba
Posts: 37
Barlow problem

Hi Everyone,

I'm having a bit of trouble with my barlow, I can't get anything to focus properly. I can get nice sharp viewing without it but if I had the barlow to the same eyepiece, it all goes a bit fuzzy.

What is the problem?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-01-2010, 12:27 PM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,003
Hi Dennis79,

Have you tried refocusing with the barlow in place? A barlow can significantly change the focal plane for an eyepiece.

If the focus lies further in than the draw tube can move, you will need to bring the primary mirror up closer to the secondary by adjusting the collimation screws, and then recollimate the optics. You would need a collimation tool to get the best results. Even if you don't raise the primary, properly collimated optics give the best possible image.

The only other alternative I see would be a new eyepiece to give you the higher power you are seeking. This is another reason I'm not a fan of barlows.

Other IISer's may come up with other suggestions.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-01-2010, 02:20 PM
Dennis79 (Keith)
Registered User

Dennis79 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toowoomba
Posts: 37
yeah mate, I have tried to refocus but the best I can get is a bit blurry. My collimation is out a touch, normal viewing is 99% crisp.

the EP and barlow are supposed to be "in sync" (I don't know the technical term) with each other so refocussing is not supposed to be required. That is certainly true when I switch between the 13mm and 9 mm EP I have.

I do have an F4.9 scope so I suppose what you have described is the problem, perhaps the barlow is altering the F ratio too far for the focusser to handle.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-01-2010, 02:34 PM
Screwdriverone's Avatar
Screwdriverone (Chris)
I have detailed files....

Screwdriverone is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
Hi Keith,

The barlow shouldnt affect the focus point that much, I have a LONG 5 x Powermate and it doesnt affect my SW12" collapsible much at all, sure I have to refocus, but when I do, its sharp.

You might find that the barlow lens may be filmy on the inside or outside, or perhaps you can unscrew the end lens element (mine does) and clean it with a soft lens cloth.

Either that or the 2 x mag is too much for the seeing?

Wait a sec, triple check your collimation because even a slight misalignment shows up badly when barlowed. If you havent already, invest in a laser collimator, using this on a collapsible is a doddle coz you can see the return dot on the secondary. This could be the issue.

Good luck.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-01-2010, 02:50 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
What eyepiece are you trying to barlow? It just may be as Chris said that you are trying too much magnification for conditions.

Is everything cooled down and collimated?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-01-2010, 03:15 PM
Dennis79 (Keith)
Registered User

Dennis79 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toowoomba
Posts: 37
Hi, it doesn't matter which EP I try to barlow, the view is always a bit blurry.

The max magnifcation I can get to is 266 and everything is cooled down.

Will have to check out the condition of the barlow when I get home, it is a new one so I expected it to be clean and never checked that.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-01-2010, 01:20 AM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
Do you have anyone nearby that will allow you to test the barlow in another telescope?

If you reseat the eyepiece slightly outside of the barlow does it make a difference? I mean with the eyepiece not fully in the barlow...or with the barlow not sitting all of the way into the focuser...do this carefullly so it won't all tumble.

I'm at a loss...sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-01-2010, 04:30 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
have you got the barlow sitting properly in the focuser, try and take it out reseating it.
try it using the longest focal length eyepiece you have like a 20mm, you could try it in the daytime on some distant tree/powerpole
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-01-2010, 06:57 PM
Fox's Avatar
Fox
Registered User

Fox is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Camberwell, Vic
Posts: 323
Dennis, as advised above, try daytime use on a distant object. You should of course get pure/sharply magnified images. If that is not the case, then something is definitely amiss, eg. the barlow sleeve length/design won't allow you to achieve focus with your optical train, or the barlow itself is faulty. Fox.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-01-2010, 11:56 AM
rider's Avatar
rider
2 screw loose stargazers

rider is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: directly under that cloud. Brisbane
Posts: 338
How old is the scope? Does it have the new "white" SW focusser?

The new focuser has a shaft restriction that doesn't let some 2" barlows completely drop to the normal seating position, so the EP focus changes to outside the available range.

If this your situation, this may the reason.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-01-2010, 04:31 PM
bobson (Bob)
Registered User

bobson is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: perth
Posts: 599
You might not have enough travel on your focuser for that Barlow. I have 2" Barlow that I have to pull out for about 2.5cm out and tighten it there in order to get focused.

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21-01-2010, 11:38 PM
Benno18's Avatar
Benno18 (Ben)
Just cant get enough

Benno18 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australind, WA, Australia
Posts: 188
dont mean to sound like your mum, but have you extended the secondary part of the tube assembely all the way out? Could effect?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-01-2010, 02:41 PM
Dennis79 (Keith)
Registered User

Dennis79 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toowoomba
Posts: 37
Thanks for all the replies.

I just went outside to test everything during the day.

Collimation is fine so that's not the issue.

I was looking at a hay shed about 1 kilometre away and got a crisp focus using the 25mm plossl. Then I put in the barlow and refocussed. I didn't get the same picture, not as crisp.

I went though this process with all of my eyepieces and the same thing happened.

I even tried moving the barlow along the focusser tube and the eyepiece within the barlow, that only made things worse. So the barlow moving the focal point is not the problem either.

I have to conclude that the barlow has a bit of a film on it and needs cleaning. Looking at my eyepieces during the day was a good idea, one of them had a big fat finger print in the middle of it!

Looks like I have a bit of cleaning to do on the weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 25-01-2010, 10:18 AM
Dennis79 (Keith)
Registered User

Dennis79 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toowoomba
Posts: 37
Doh!!

Hi everyone,

Thanks heaps for all the suggestions, turns out the problem was the novice viewer.

I took the scope out to an astronmer friend last night, turns out I was not following the collimation process correctly. I suppose that is what happens when you only read about things and never actually see them happen.

Anyway we collimated it and it all works fine now.

Bad collimation was the problem and is a bit of a problem with the collapsible versions, the scope moves a bit between each collapse and extension.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 25-01-2010, 10:30 AM
Screwdriverone's Avatar
Screwdriverone (Chris)
I have detailed files....

Screwdriverone is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
Hi Dennis,

Yes, my 12" suffers a bit from collimation drift. I notice the secondary tilt changes from setup for about 2 hours, very strange, I think it has something to do with the thin secondary vanes cooling down and contracting.

I often find I have to check every hour to be sure, and more often than not, have to retilt the secondary, Bob's knobs are on the wishlist as the allen key dance is very annoying.

May just be my one (white, not BD black) which I suspect is an inferior version to the black ones from accounts I have heard / read in magazine reviews.

Because of the fast F5 mirror, if its not spot on, then the views suffer a lot.

Glad you sorted it out.

Cheers

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 25-01-2010, 12:34 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
Glad you got it sorted...no doubt collimation is an important skill to gain as a newtonian reflector owner.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 25-01-2010, 04:51 PM
Kevnool's Avatar
Kevnool (Kev)
Fast Scope & Fast Engine

Kevnool is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Broken Hill N.S.W
Posts: 3,305
Try losing the Barlow as your only looking through extra glass.
Get the eyepiece to achieve the magnification you want.
But thats me.

Cheers Kev.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement