Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-12-2008, 01:24 AM
interstellar's Avatar
interstellar
Registered User

interstellar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Akron Ohio
Posts: 44
Northern Vs Southern Hemisphere.

Which hemisphere is your prefered hemisphere for Dso's and the M's observing. I know in summertime in the northern hemisphere we have the heart of the milkyway grace our night sky while the southern hemisphere has Orion, Canis Major in their summer night sky. Thats why I ask this question. What are the benifits of each hemisphere and the drawbacks. Seasonal and otherwise.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:51 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Southern hemisphere wins every time!!

About 37deg south I think is the optimum!!!!
Clear skies, wonderful climate and you can see everything in the night sky ( and the Sun as well during the day!) that's worth looking at.
I've been back in the UK at 52deg north for the last year or so and could literally count the number of clear days/ nights on both hands. Wet, cloudy, wet, cloudy - repeat ad nausium.
( Not that I'm biased or anything - he says with a sniff! as he wipes away the tears.)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:52 AM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,406
I recently made a list of 352 Messier like objects, 148 were in the north (including 92 galaxies) and 204 were in the south. The center of the Milky Way is overhead at latitude -29 degrees and we have some great DSO objects including omega Cen, 47 Tuc, eta Car, the LMC and the SMC. In NSW and Qld it is clear in winter when the MW is overhead.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2008, 07:04 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Yep 37 degrees South is spot on, that is where I live.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2008, 08:02 AM
Bobj's Avatar
Bobj
Registered User

Bobj is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mackay, Qld
Posts: 282
How about Lat 21 Deg South, Mackay, Qld. Can see most of Ursa Major to Musca constellations. And don't need heavy clothing for winter viewing....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-12-2008, 11:03 AM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobj View Post
How about Lat 21 Deg South, Mackay, Qld. Can see most of Ursa Major to Musca constellations. And don't need heavy clothing for winter viewing....
Just a raincoat most of summer.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2008, 12:33 PM
Paddy's Avatar
Paddy (Patrick)
Canis Minor

Paddy is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Strangways, Vic
Posts: 2,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Yep 37 degrees South is spot on, that is where I live.

Leon
Ditto!

Ditto also to Glen's post - hard to go past the Magellanic Clouds and the galactic centre overhead in winter.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2008, 01:43 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
I've done both...the Southern is better in my opinion...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-12-2008, 02:59 PM
robgreaves
Registered User

robgreaves is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Penrith NSW
Posts: 159
Having lived at 53'N and 33'S, it's actually a tough call.

The quality of the skies is better down here; less LP, and steadier seeing.

However, both hemispheres have their showpiece objects. M101 is stunning. And M31 rises much higher in the N than it does here. Cassiopeia and its myriad clusters and nebulosity is great (and high) to image. For an imager, object altitude wrt to the horizon is so important for good sharp shots.

But there again there are no LMC and SMC up there, or Eta Carina...

Conversely, if you like viewing or imaging Galaxies, the N is the place to be.

Oh, and a quick polar align is a whole lot earier in the North

Regards,
Rob
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-12-2008, 03:35 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Oh, and a quick polar align is a whole lot earier in the North http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/....milies/lol.gif

Regards,
Rob

Now Rob that is so true, it would make things just that bit easier if we had one of those, down South.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:31 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by robgreaves View Post
Having lived at 53'N and 33'S, it's actually a tough call.

Regards,
Rob
Hi Rob,

I entertain a couple of dozen visiting US amateurs each year and have done for a few years. You are the first person I have heard say, "it's a tough call". The general consensus amongst the visiting US observers is that the Southern Hemisphere wins by a fair margin. Most of the visitors I help to entertain have now made repeated trips to Australia, some in fact up to 8 times. That must say something. I can appreciate however that for an imager things may be a little different.

I have also travelled to the Northern Hemisphere to observe and personally rate the Southern Hemisphere a good way in front. I am however strictly a visual observer. I will concede that the single best thing I have ever looked at is M51 in Larry Mitchell's 36" Obsession, which is generally considered a "northern" target, notwithstanding it is visible from many parts of Australia.

Cheers,
John B
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-12-2008, 03:18 PM
hector (Andrew)
Registered User

hector is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Umina NSW Australia
Posts: 279
I have observed from both hemispheres and while my exposure to the North is limited, the lack of a prominate Milky Way and the Missing LMC and SMC would have me choosing the South. I like John B have been entertaining overseas visitors for over 20 years now. ALL of the visitors have advised that we have the better end of the stick. in my opinion.
Best Galaxy: Milky Way overhead during winter, or LMC
Best Nebula: Eta Carina
Best Globular: 47 TUC or Omega Cen depending on your preference.
Best Open Cluster: Jewel Box.
Best Variable Star: Eta Carina
Bets Double star: Alpha Cen.
Best Planetarie goes North with either the Ring or the Dumbell both of which we can see anyway.
Even the last great Supernova and Comet were in the South.
My preference is about 30deg south. Clouds up high, Milky Way center overhead, and most of the best northern targets are high enough over the horizon to see properly.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-12-2008, 03:59 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by hector View Post
In my opinion.

Best Galaxy: Milky Way overhead during winter, or LMC Agreed

Best Nebula: Eta Carina Agreed

Best Globular: 47 TUC or Omega Cen depending on your preference. Agreed

Best Open Cluster: Jewel Box. A very tough call. I also rate The Football Cluster NGC 3532 right up there with The Jewel Box

Best Variable Star: Eta Carina My favourites are Eta Carina and Hind's Crismson Star (R Leporis) but Eta Carina also has the Homonculus to give it an easy victory

Best Double star: Alpha Cen. My favourite is X Velorum (Dunlop 95) because of the colour contrast, but Alpha Centaurus is right up there

Best Planetary goes North with either the Ring or the Dumbell both of which we can see anyway. I rate NGC 3242 The Ghost of Jupiter at least as good as both of those

Even the last great Supernova and Comet were in the South. Agreed

My preference is about 30deg south. Clouds up high, Milky Way center overhead, and most of the best northern targets are high enough over the horizon to see properly. Agreed
Cheers,
John B
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-12-2008, 09:20 PM
Stephen65's Avatar
Stephen65
Registered User

Stephen65 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 358
I've experienced both and in my opinion the south easily triumphs. The fact that the centre of the Milky Way is at 29S makes it hard for the north to compete on anything save galaxies. When I travel to the USA my usual first impression as I get used to everything being upside down is how "empty" the sky looks in comparison.

That said, there are many great things to see in the north and anybody who hasn't experienced both hemispheres is missing out.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-12-2008, 10:40 PM
Domol's Avatar
Domol (Domenic)
Bring on the night!

Domol is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dingley Village
Posts: 162
I've spoken to a few astronomers from the USA and they dream of the
Centaurus - Carina region........mmm eta Carina!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-12-2008, 10:57 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
The big diff off course is that most of the uber gurus are in the NH, leaveing us more opportunity to produce gobsmackers in the SH. But the margin is narrowing swiftly, the NH punks are installing rigs in the SH at an alarming rate of nots, we have but a small window of opportunity before the imaging world is swamped by SH images unrepeatable by us colonial convicts
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-12-2008, 11:06 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Double cluster in Perseus is a lovely Northern object.

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 13-12-2008, 05:26 PM
Smirnoff
Licensed to get drunk

Smirnoff is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vostok Station
Posts: 111
The south, hands down. Sure, the NH has some fine showpieces, but most of those are visible even from southern Australia, whereas our finest stuff are largely invisble from temperate north latitudes, and the center of the milky way is hopelessly low from lats about 45º north and above.

E.G.

from 35ºS, one can easily see: M57, M13, M45, M31, M33, M27, All of the Virgo + Coma galaxies, and all of the Leo Galaxies. The only objects that escape our grasp are M101, M51 and M81/82.

By contrast, those at 35ºN cannot at all see: The LMC / SMC, 47 TUC, Eta Carina, while Omega Centauri is hopelessly low (M13 is actually 10º closer to the celestial equator giving us better access to it than what the northerners have to Omega).

M42 is actually itself a southern object, which, at -5º dec, appears 10º higher in the sky from a certain southern lat than from the corresponding northern lat.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 13-12-2008, 05:43 PM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,406
Bright D.S.O. north of declination +50

OC: NGC457, M103, NGC869-84, M52, NGC7789
GC: None
Neb: NGC281, NGC7023, NGC7538
PN: M76, M97, NGC6543
Galaxy: M81, M82, M101, M108, M109, NGC2403, NGC6946
The rest are visible from latitude 30 south.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 14-12-2008, 02:19 AM
Enchilada
Enhanced Astronomer

Enchilada is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 753
NH is Really Better...

Northern Hemisphere is better because it does have southern observers bragging how much better their skies actually are... Also;

1) Northern Hemisphere (NH) has the Andromeda Galaxy, and some bright and large nearby independent galaxies
2) The NH has better planetary nebula Ring Nebula, etc.
3) Less stars making it easier to find you way around without confusion.
4) The best open cluster is Double Cluster in Perseus
5) Better Double Stars, and more colourful ones - due to the proximity of one of the Milky Way Galaxy's spiral arms.
6) A decent pole star
7) Constellation with a classical history
8) Has the best Constellation in the sky - Cassiopeia
9) Most variable stars have the class of variable named after them. I.e. Cepheus - Cepheid variables. Gamma Cas variables, etc.
10) Patrick Moore

What else do you need?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement