Go Back   IceInSpace > IceInSpace > Website Feedback and FAQ
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 21-12-2009, 12:34 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
uploaded images - what happens to them?

Does the forum image upload engine modify/compress images on upload, even if they're under the kB limit etc? I'm sure the quality/sharpness of images uploaded is less than my originals and can't figure out why. Eg this is a link to 800px wide recent image direct from my website, and compare that to the uploaded one below. They should be identical.

http://piggo.com/~troy/photos/2009/2009_12_20/troypiggo_4180.jpg
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (troypiggo_4180.jpg)
103.2 KB72 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-12-2009, 12:55 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Apart from a speck of dark matter hitching a ride on the IIS image's wing, I cannot tell the difference. Either my eyes are shot or you are a fussy man, Troy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-12-2009, 01:00 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Hi Troy

The images are not further compressed - they are simply uploaded as is.
  • Images are not modified if they are under the size limit.
  • Images are modified if they are over the size limit. In which case, the forum software will try to reduce the size of the image to meet the attachment size limits. Currently that is 200KB per attachment.

Regarding your images, they are identical to me.

The black background vs white background can make them look a bit different, but I took a screenshot of both images, and layered them in photoshop and blink compared them, and there's absolutely no difference.

I even changed the blend mode to 'difference' and I got a black screen - so the images are identical.

Last edited by mojo; 21-12-2009 at 04:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-12-2009, 02:09 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick View Post
Apart from a speck of dark matter hitching a ride on the IIS image's wing......
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-12-2009, 04:30 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick View Post
Apart from a speck of dark matter hitching a ride on the IIS image's wing, I cannot tell the difference. Either my eyes are shot or you are a fussy man, Troy
Hehe. No, that's not what I am talking about. That was a dust spot I healed after the upload here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
Hi Troy

The images are not further compressed - they are simply uploaded as is.

Regarding your images, they are identical to me.

The black background vs white background can make them look a bit different, but I took a screenshot of both images, and layered them in photoshop and blink compared them, and there's absolutely no difference.

I even changed the blend mode to 'difference' and I got a black screen - so the images are identical.
Hmm, I hadn't thought of trying that, difference layer blending, to test. I must be going crazy, or there's some optical illusion going on.

Sorry for the waste of time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement