Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-12-2009, 04:19 PM
ColHut (Colin)
Registered User

ColHut is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 266
Bahtinov Mask

How many of you fellows use them for visual use? I was wondering as I have sometimes difficulty getting good focus on the moon and wondered if I get proper focus on a small star it should be right despite the seeing for the moon?

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-12-2009, 06:56 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Since for all practical purposes when it comes to focusing the Moon and stars are at infinity, using a star will be fine. The Moon and planets are too big and bright and the diffraction spikes are indistinct.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-12-2009, 11:22 AM
Benno85's Avatar
Benno85 (Ben)
Registered User

Benno85 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wilton, NSW
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by mithrandir View Post
Since for all practical purposes when it comes to focusing the Moon and stars are at infinity, using a star will be fine. The Moon and planets are too big and bright and the diffraction spikes are indistinct.
Apologies on a stuuuuuupid question, but does that mean that one could use the mask and achieve focus on, say, Sirius, and then to M42 and commence imaging without the need for refocusing?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-12-2009, 02:01 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benno85 View Post
Apologies on a stuuuuuupid question, but does that mean that one could use the mask and achieve focus on, say, Sirius, and then to M42 and commence imaging without the need for refocusing?
In theory "yes". In practice, you may get mirror movement in a reflector as you go from one part of the sky to another. You'd be pretty safe doing it with a refractor.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-12-2009, 02:24 PM
Benno85's Avatar
Benno85 (Ben)
Registered User

Benno85 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wilton, NSW
Posts: 241
Cheers Geoff, I'd be using a refractor so you've put my mind at ease
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement