Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-03-2010, 10:48 AM
koputai's Avatar
koputai (Jason)
Registered User

koputai is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,648
Erfle's and Kellners

Has anyone around here owned/used the Kokusai Kkohki Erfle or Kellner eyepieces?

I expect the build quality is excellent, what do you think of them optically?

Cheers,
Jason.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2010, 11:30 AM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
i have looked thru an erfle..nice views - i wouldn't use them in a short scope (or barlow if i did) - but fro f8-f10 they give fairly wide views which are pleasing
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-03-2010, 10:56 PM
koputai's Avatar
koputai (Jason)
Registered User

koputai is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,648
Yeah, I have a couple of Erfle's already, and they're very nice, very easy on the eye. Less work than Naglers, more like a Panoptic. Don't get me wrong, I love Naglers, but the Pans and Erfles are just more comfortable, they feel more natural to the eye than wider or indeed narrower ep's.

I was just wondering what the performance of the Japanese made Erfle's and Kellners was like, if their throughput is better than the more modern eyepieces with more elements.

Cheers,
Jason.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-03-2010, 07:13 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Kellners: very limited. Basically an obsolete design best suited to f/15 refractors. 40 degree field of view. These days they're junk, and not made anymore.
If you want a 3-element eyepiece, buy a set of Edmund RKE's, they are as good as it gets with 3 elements.
The only other 3 element design on the market are the TMB supermonos, excellent planetary eyepieces (high contrast and sharp) but limited field of view.

Erfle: another very old design, better than Kellners; they give nice wide low-power field views in an f/8 scope, but no good in faster scopes, and no good at low focal lengths because the eye relief is very very short. So short that Erfles were never made much below 20mm focal length, and even at that size an orthoscopic was usually preferred. For a while I had a monster army-surplus 60mm Erfle, it needed a custom barrel as it was bigger than a 2" focusser, and the field of view was monstrous, BUT to be honest my 40mm TMB Paragon is a lot better in an f/7 refractor.

Most modern wideangle eyepieces will do a lot better than an Erfle - even the cheap GSO's, Orion Stratus, Baader Hyperion, Vixen LVW, TMB Paragon, TV Panoptic, Radian etc.

Last edited by Wavytone; 14-03-2010 at 07:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-03-2010, 07:31 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
John Bambury wrote a great little history of most types in
this post, part of a thread about Plössls.
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...30&postcount=6

FWIW the two cheap UO Kellners I have had for nearly 30 years perform
beautifully in my 8" F7 Homemade Newt. Shorter FL scopes, not so
well, as Wavy has said.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement