Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-11-2009, 10:32 PM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Ngc 1365

Hi All,

Here's an NGC 1365 from the 14th and 17th.

3 hours of Luminance, an hour each for each of the R, G and B, in 10 minute subs for the luminance, 5 minute binned 2x2 for the colour.

Aligned and stacked in CCDStack. Colour synthesis and final mucking about in Photoshop.

GSO 8" RC, Losmandy G11, SBIG etc (See sig).

Bigger picture available here

Cheers
Stuart
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC1365LRGB.jpg)
191.0 KB52 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-11-2009, 11:48 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
This is a tough target Stuart. I did over 7 hours on this beast and still found noise lurking. I think 5 minute subs on this does not help overly much and with my data it created a lot of noise. You might be blending differently to what I am doing though.

You have lots of detail but there is colour noise in the image background. I don't know if you can see it. Your stars though are small and sharp. Got any tips for that?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-11-2009, 12:18 AM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Hi Paul,

The 16Bit image looks a lot better than the jpeg. When I converted the image it looked dark, so I boosted the luminance a little bit, may have overcooked it a bit? I also didin't want to incur the "you've clipped the background" wrath

Here's a nicer one...

Cheers
Stuart
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC1365LRGB2.jpg)
193.8 KB18 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-11-2009, 12:23 AM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Forgot to answer the question about the star processing.

Select the stars using the colour range tool, only the bright ones need shrinking.

Expand by 5 pixels, then feather by 2 or three.

Filter, other, minimum, 1 pixel.

If that's too much then fade the filter (edit, fade)

Works like magic.

Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-11-2009, 12:29 AM
StarGazing (Alex)
Registered User

StarGazing is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 163
Very nice Stuart, had a look at that just recently through 14" Dob ...... Didnt look as good as that .

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-11-2009, 01:28 AM
zipdrive's Avatar
zipdrive (Dave)
Registered User

zipdrive is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 228
SBig with AOL.. my dream combo... nice work!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-11-2009, 06:35 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Really nice stuart, lovely contrast and colours.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-11-2009, 10:03 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
Very nice work Stuart. That is absolutely superb.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-11-2009, 10:20 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Stuart yes that looks better. Thanks for the star processing guide too.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement