Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Poll: What do you regularly use for Image Processing
Poll Options
What do you regularly use for Image Processing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-11-2005, 01:51 PM
JohnH's Avatar
JohnH
Member # 159

JohnH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,226
What Image Processing Software do you use

And Why? I have PS Elements 2 (came with the cameras and I love it) the Canon utilites (likewise), Registax 3 (I hate it but its free), Iris (cannot figure it out but its free), autostitch (great software), Mead AutostarSuite (came with the LPI but I have not tried the image processing module), PixInsight LE (have not played with it yet). I have aslo tried the demos of Registars (loved it), Maxim DL (Good), Images Plus (also good) and K3CCDTools. I am at the point where I want to spend some $$$ to get faster at this vital part of our hobby, mostly I will be wanting to work with Canon RAWs, occasional LPI work - consensus seems to be K3CCDtools for that.

So should I persist with IRIS, go for IP or Maxim or something else? Oh and BTW does Elements 3 handle 16 bit TIFFs or RAWs?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-11-2005, 02:03 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
i am growing to love Iris (took a lot of hours though!!!), but image plus sounds the best going around. I have subscribed to iris groups and imageplus and the image plus is very very active.

It ends up being for me, iris to capture, ppmcentre, registax and then back into iris and final words and comments in photoshop
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-11-2005, 03:45 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
I just got Images plus.....it has already improved my previous images done with Photoshop CS.....nothing against photoshop....you can get close to the same results with photoshop...just imagesplus makes it easier.

I will continue using Imagesplus 2.5 with Photoshop CS 2 and Photodeluxe 4.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-11-2005, 04:55 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Gimp, Cinepaint, and the bread-and-butter image processing toolkit, ImageMagick.

Last edited by janoskiss; 15-11-2005 at 05:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-11-2005, 05:10 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Micrografax picture publisher # 8. Software that came with my scanner. Does a lot of stuff like splits the RBG channels etc etc.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-11-2005, 06:03 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,438
I have just recently moved to Photoshop CS2 from Photoshop 7. The photomerge in CS2 is excellent for assembling mosaics (particularly from long lenses / scopes).

I do have registax and play with it a bit, but I'm far from knowing what I'm doing with it. I know what it's supposed to do, but working with just a few images at a time, I am yet to achieve what I expect it does... I think I just need to get with someone who knows what they are doing with it so I can learn a few things...

I also regularly use Arcsoft Panorama Maker. I take a lot of panoramic landscapes (and also industrial photos) and it does an excellent job even with wide angle lenses. It has a few limitations (e.g it won't even work with images outside certain proportions but if you need to assemble a mosaic it is possible by planning the sequence you join you images. For less than AUD$40 for a registered copy, I can't recommend it highly enough for panoramas, and it might make a viable low cost alternative to other software for assembling mosaics (if you are patient enough).

Al.

PS. I have also used Panavue as a trial version. It is more tolerant of conical distortion errors than Panoramam Maker, but produces some odd shaped images. I think it maintains angular position well so for astro work would be fine if you aren't worried about necessarily having a rectangular image when you're finished...

Last edited by sheeny; 15-11-2005 at 06:08 PM. Reason: PS
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-11-2005, 07:25 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Have you tried autostitch? It's the best mosaic/panorama program i've seen.. though i've only used a couple.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-11-2005, 02:46 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
I have PSP vers 8, 9, and 10 currently. I use these for most pics.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-11-2005, 10:11 AM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Image capture: Linux + Coriander (firewire) or Qastrocam (ToUCam)
Processing: ppmcentre (Linux/Windows), registax, Astra Image, The Gimp.

regards, Bird
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement