Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-11-2009, 10:35 PM
AdrianF's Avatar
AdrianF (Adrian)
Currently Scopeless

AdrianF is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moura Qld
Posts: 1,774
My first Orion

This is my first attempt at Orion. Took the photo last night through my ED127 not real good but its better than any other attempt I have made.
The alignment wasnt spot on as you can see from the star trails.
This photo was taken at ISO800 and 10 second exposure.
Beside the alignment not being good what can I do to improve the photo?
I had tried to use a 2.5 barlow but I couldnt find anything in the view finder so just went back to scope- extension tube- camera.

Adrian
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (orion1.jpg)
77.7 KB92 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-11-2009, 10:36 PM
Davros's Avatar
Davros (Lauren)
stumblebum

Davros is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maroochydore
Posts: 765
Nice, congratulations, looks like we are playing the same game.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-11-2009, 10:43 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Congrats on your first M42. Looks very similar to my first attempt (which is still my best lol!!!).

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-11-2009, 10:43 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
What?, did you attempt any stretching at all?. Astronomical images have a huge dynamic range, and require some , any form of nonlinear expansion.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-11-2009, 10:45 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
I don't think you'll get much stretch wise out of that image, not with only 10 seconds. Then again, I could (and probably are), wrong!

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-11-2009, 08:40 AM
AdrianF's Avatar
AdrianF (Adrian)
Currently Scopeless

AdrianF is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moura Qld
Posts: 1,774
Except for resizing I have done nothing to the picture. I am going to try again this weekend for more data and hopefully get it in focus and tracking right. I did take about 60 pictures but I forgot to take the bahtinov off for 20 or so pictures so everything ended up with spikes.

Adrian
should mentioned that the weather will control this we have smoke and dust on the way lots of fires around here again and grey dust.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-11-2009, 11:56 AM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
Suggestions on your image.

you have a guide scope and a DSI, use them... then your polar alignment isn't as critical as the guiding will look after most of it.

Take longer exposures don't be affraid to bump it out to 10 min even longer with auto guiding you will blow the core out but thats when you take reduction images.

PM me and ill give you a bit of information regarding taking some photos.

this is what a 40d, eq6 and 10"sw are capable of doing when guided

http://s700.photobucket.com/albums/w...nal-HQ-AFC.jpg

2x 10min 9 x 2min, 1min, 30sec, 15sec all at iso 200 no darks flats or bias processed in adobe photoshop CS3
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-11-2009, 12:51 PM
AdrianF's Avatar
AdrianF (Adrian)
Currently Scopeless

AdrianF is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moura Qld
Posts: 1,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmitchell82 View Post
Suggestions on your image.

you have a guide scope and a DSI, use them... then your polar alignment isn't as critical as the guiding will look after most of it.

Take longer exposures don't be affraid to bump it out to 10 min even longer with auto guiding you will blow the core out but thats when you take reduction images.

PM me and ill give you a bit of information regarding taking some photos.

this is what a 40d, eq6 and 10"sw are capable of doing when guided

http://s700.photobucket.com/albums/w...nal-HQ-AFC.jpg

2x 10min 9 x 2min, 1min, 30sec, 15sec all at iso 200 no darks flats or bias processed in adobe photoshop CS3
pm sent

Adrian
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-11-2009, 12:57 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
That's a very good first shot Adrian. I push the data a bit more and you can start making out the nebulosity around.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (orion_stretched.jpg)
151.5 KB44 views
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-11-2009, 01:08 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,757
Hi Adrian, the ED 127 is a good choice (I can say this because I just bought one myself).

The length of exposure is going to be a major limitation on the image you produce. Ten seconds on M42 in a single exposure will get you a pretty basic image. Have a look in this forum about 8 or so days back when I posted my ED127's first light. That was 3 x 10 minute exposures stacked and tweaked with Photoshop. That'll give you a sense at least of the scale that is possible in straight prime focus imaging on this scope.

I suggest that you consider guiding and, with that, the possibility of longer exposures. Then, I suggest you consider stacking multiple images and using an image processing program like Photoshop to tweak out the data that is lurking in the images.

Come down to Ten Chain Hill on one of our New Moon nights and have a play with some other imagers and see whether they can help you too.

Peter

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-11-2009, 02:42 PM
AdrianF's Avatar
AdrianF (Adrian)
Currently Scopeless

AdrianF is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moura Qld
Posts: 1,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmrid View Post
Hi Adrian, the ED 127 is a good choice (I can say this because I just bought one myself).

The length of exposure is going to be a major limitation on the image you produce. Ten seconds on M42 in a single exposure will get you a pretty basic image. Have a look in this forum about 8 or so days back when I posted my ED127's first light. That was 3 x 10 minute exposures stacked and tweaked with Photoshop. That'll give you a sense at least of the scale that is possible in straight prime focus imaging on this scope.

I suggest that you consider guiding and, with that, the possibility of longer exposures. Then, I suggest you consider stacking multiple images and using an image processing program like Photoshop to tweak out the data that is lurking in the images.

Come down to Ten Chain Hill on one of our New Moon nights and have a play with some other imagers and see whether they can help you too.

Peter

Peter
Thanks Peter I will take you up on the offer to visit sometime but it wont be this year this is a very busy time for me at the moment. I teach at TAFE and I am currently doing the work of 3 teachers, Metal Fabrication, Fitting and Carpentary my workload will be down to 2 teachers next week as a carpenter will be here from Toowoomba.
I only experimented with the scope and camera to see what I could get.
I basically gave up about 6 months ago because I couldnt get any good photos, I almost put all my gear on the market. I do have a guiding interface and software and guidescope etc but have been putting things off due to the work load and studying AutoCAD.

Once I get organised I will get things working properly and hopefully start getting some decent photos.

Adrian
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-11-2009, 04:19 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
One thing you will want to do is really work on that polar alignment. As Brendan said, once you're guiding, polar alignment becomes less critical, however its better to have the guider doing as little work as possible, and the only way to do that is to have a good alignment.. Judging by the amount of drift you were getting in 10sec subs, I'd say your alignment was quite a long way off... (much better than my first attempts though! haha)

I think you could definitely benifet from a night out at 10 chain hill.. Between Peter, Robin, Jeanette, Rob and myself imaging on the field, I dare say you could pickup quite a few things... (untill we all start getting messy that is! )

Its a good first attempt, and you can only get better from here on out mate!

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-11-2009, 07:51 PM
AdrianF's Avatar
AdrianF (Adrian)
Currently Scopeless

AdrianF is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moura Qld
Posts: 1,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
That's a very good first shot Adrian. I push the data a bit more and you can start making out the nebulosity around.
Does look a little better.

Adrian
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-11-2009, 08:22 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Great going for your first effort Adrian - congratulations. Once you start seeing more detail in your pics than you can every hope to see by eye in the 'scope you'll be hooked and sliding down the slippery expensive slope with the rest of us!

There's a lot of science and black magic in the processing side for astronomical imaging too - probably 50% effort in field getting great data to start with, then pretty much as long to pry out the fine detail. All part of the learning curve fun, and plenty of helpful people here to help.

Alex is right about 10 Chain if you're ever inclined to be Bris area. Good company and plenty of equipment diversity
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement