I have both LCD and CRT displays here at home, and for the life of me I can't get one image that looks good on both of them.
So I want to know if other people have the same trouble - what display do you have, and which of these (identically processed) images looks "better" to you?
I like the LCD, but am looking at it on an LCD. I am often asked if I would like to sharpen my images; even though the images look slightly over sharpened on my screen. Personally images made on LCD screens should be the norm as the LCD is the current technology and CRT is soon to become a thing of the past.
To throw another angle in on this, I use two laptops, one with a shiny high definition screen and one older standard and it makes quite a difference - what looks bright and clear on the shiny (technical term ) screen often looks duller on the non-shiny laptop and almost invisible on the work CRT...
Either way the two images below are beautiful - the CRT seems more striking, but the LCD appears more "natural", viewed that is from my shiny laptop screen...
Im viewing on a crt but prefer the lcd image for the simple reason that it looks closer to what I was seeing visually. I think many images I see here look unnatural with the contrast boosted to bring out details.
I'm viewing it on a CRT today, and I don't know which one I prefer. I can see the same level of detail in both. Only thing apparent is the reduced saturation of the LCD version. Unlike Geoff, I don't think either of them is closer to what I see at the eyepiece, where Mars has a very high brightness that cannot be reproduced on displays or in print.
As I said before, on my cheap LCD the CRT version shows more.