Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-09-2009, 09:14 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
What do I need to run pempro

Hi
I have a Losmandy GM8 running Gemini 4 and would like to use Pempro. I have had a look at the demo version and it's a bit difficult to sort out what's happening. The interface seems to be a bit overwhelming. Do I really need a planetarium program for example. It's not something I feel I need with the reasonably good Gemini goto.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-09-2009, 11:26 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
You dont need a planetarium program to use pempro. I found pempro good for polar align, and its good for PEC, thats what its for, but I gave up after much grief tring to get a good PEC curve on a Gemini G11. If you feel your PE is reasonable, spend your money on good guiding software instead.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-09-2009, 08:42 AM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Thanks Fred.

I'll speak to you about it at the next astroimaging meeting.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-09-2009, 10:09 AM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
I'm kind of in the same boat as Fred actually. I tried it with my LX200 classic and never managed to get my PE better than I get it using the standard built in PEC of the LX200.

I know that many others have, so I was probably doing something wrong, but fact is in the 30 day trial (within which I managed to use it about 5 times) I didn't get it sorted, and it became not worth my time so I gave up and went back to the built in LX200 PEC and autoguiding.

I haven't ruled out trying it again some day though.

I've found PEC in the Gemini on my GM8 to be excellent, so hadn't even considered using it there.

Edit: I don't remember it needing other software but can't be sore because I have TheSky, CCDSoft, etc running all the time anyhow.

Edit2: My PEC training on LX200 and Gemini are always done using autoguiding, to get it as accurate as possible. If doing it manually perhaps I would have seen more difference between built in PEC and PEMPro.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-09-2009, 03:20 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Not wanting to put you on the spot Fred, but define reasonable? The truth of the matter is if your PE is greater than your arcsec/pixel combination, it is then deemed unreasonable. Clearly, guiding as you indicate mitigates this, however I think you'll agree that the fewer guiding corrections the better (indicating excellent tracking / low PE).

Anything that can improve your mounts performance is a good thing given it is the critical piece of the puzzle in the imaging game.

Also don't use PEMPro with an ASCOM hub. Just direct with the Gemini driver.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-09-2009, 03:56 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,888
I ran PEMPro on my Vixen Atlux (via ASCOM -> MaxPoint) and MaximDL to control a Meade DSI II Pro Mono (although you can directly drive a DSI without CCDSOft or MaximDL thanks to changes Ray did for us).

When I guide with PHD I see the RA corrections look random and about +/- 2.5 arc seconds - so by my book PEMPro is doing its think well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-09-2009, 06:32 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
Not wanting to put you on the spot Fred, but define reasonable? The truth of the matter is if your PE is greater than your arcsec/pixel combination, it is then deemed unreasonable. Clearly, guiding as you indicate mitigates this, however I think you'll agree that the fewer guiding corrections the better (indicating excellent tracking / low PE).

Anything that can improve your mounts performance is a good thing given it is the critical piece of the puzzle in the imaging game.

Also don't use PEMPro with an ASCOM hub. Just direct with the Gemini driver.
I didnt define reasonable on purpose Jase, cause thats a minefield in itself, depends what your after .

I agree, PEC is a wonderous thing, but what I meant by my experience was, at the time I found curves were inverted (I got on to the author about that, its a long story, I think its alright now) and each run was so different it simply couldnt make a decent usable PEC result (couldve been cause my mount was overloaded). Also, in the mean time, I just started imaging, and found guiding good enough to just not bother with PEC anymore. My PE was "reasonably" smooth and guiding easily handled it (with 2 sec guide exposures), so I left it at that.

Im back to using it now to great effect, but its a different rig.

PEC becomes much more important with much longer guide exposures. With the G11 I always used 2 secs, so it mattered less.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement