Noise or not, still looks very nice... The reflection neb looks like it could have done with more exposure, however the dusty areas seem to have come out nicely... Seems odd.. Usually that happens the other way around!
thanks Alex. I don't tend to push the saturation very high on reflection nebs. Really blue reflection nebs tend to look too artificial to me, though I take your point, this one is a bit bland.
Nice shot Paul for only a few subs. I'm working through my folders of images and have finally worked out why the DSS images were so grey when brought into PS - still had sRGB set in PS and Adobe RGB in the camera - doh!
Nice! I should have attempted some of these guys while up there, but think I'll stick with the simple stuff first and leave the faint dusties to you pros.
One of the reasons it images so well Troy, is because it has an intense background of stars. Check out the wide field from last year....or was it the year before. Its one of those high satisfaction areas.
Hmmm.... another one I really should pull out and work over again.
It's a shame images like these need to be compressed so much to get them uploaded. The compression (even using PS Save for Web and Devices) really hacks into the stars.
pretty good for only 3 exposures ,anything with 3 willl be noisy trying to stretch it for the dust. pity you didnt have moreas the reflection dust is starting to show some nice streamer detail
Nice shot Paul for only a few subs. I'm working through my folders of images and have finally worked out why the DSS images were so grey when brought into PS - still had sRGB set in PS and Adobe RGB in the camera - doh!
Paul, Great shot, I hope my images look as good when I'm finished processing.
Re Peters quote: What should the settings on the camera and photoshop be set to??