Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-09-2005, 05:36 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,372
AOE 102L - 100mm Refractor

Hello All,
Has anyone had experience with this scope (AOE 100mm Refractor)?
AOE offer it for $638 with an EQ5 on a tubular steel mount.
I think it would be excellent for wide field work.
Any pros and cons greatly appreciated as due to the Australian Tax Office my $1000 budget has significantly shrunk!

All the best

Cheers

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-09-2005, 05:53 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi. Be prepared for some violet fringing on bright objects eg: venus & jupiter. A fringe killer will nip that problem in the bud 90%. I can't remember the FL of the 100mm in question. The EQ5 should be pretty good with that size scope (depending on the length of the OTA) If the tripod is the aluminium leg variety you may have potential vibration dampening etc problems.

I have the AOE 152L & I'm delighted with it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-09-2005, 08:14 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Paul (1ponders) has something very similar. See his previous post:

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...5&postcount=46
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-09-2005, 11:00 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Sorry, miss-read your 1st post Doug. The steel tripod then. The whole setup is identical to mine, only my OTA is bigger diametre & weighs more. The 'lever arm problem' would be the same as mine having the same length OTA. I can honestly say I haven't noticed this 'problem' with mine..You would have less CA with 100mm F10 than my 152mm F8

Some dudes have a real problem with CA & some don't. I'm one that doesn't.

Try before you buy if at all possible!

For photography well...their not much chop really.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-10-2005, 02:02 PM
garylea
Registered User

garylea is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wamboin
Posts: 13
Returning to the fold...

After fourteen years away from astronomy, a very, very inquisitive child has lured me back (sleeps with a "Planets" book in hand, etc.).

Space/carrying constraints mean a mid-sized refractor at most (and I always loved them anyway...). Budget (<$700) started me looking at a 90mm Celestron Firstscope until I saw the AOE 102L, asked around, etc. The AOE people have been very helpful to us.

I'm just counting down the days (and, of course, hoping the weather picks). I've even found a stand for a junior sky watcher!!!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement