Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-07-2009, 06:22 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Smile Back into imaging at last - M16 in Ha

Hi Guys, just finished processing that one. 10x600s in Ha, dark/flat calibrated on my newly flocked 5” newtonian last night. Probably need more data but I’ve put nearly 5h on M8 so something had to give - Still processing M8 - will post later. Trying to do a HaL RGB .

Full frame is at: http://www.multiweb.com.au/astro/M16_Ha_20090703_f.jpg [2.44MB]

Enjoy - Comments/tips most welcome
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M16_Ha_20090703_c.jpg)
195.1 KB86 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-07-2009, 06:25 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
Really nice image Mark tracking etc looks spot on. I like the errie look of HA images something surreal about them is this possible with a DSLR

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-07-2009, 06:34 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Very nice Marc. The detail all beit small is really good. I think I am starting to enjoy Ha as a mono image. Still not taken by false colour NB offerings.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-07-2009, 06:38 PM
bokglob's Avatar
bokglob (Darrell)
ph0t0n3la5t3r

bokglob is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: brisbane australia
Posts: 256
nice work there marc really good depth and detail,very impressed! looking forward to your m8.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-07-2009, 06:42 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Good to see you back imaging again Marc. The presented FOV really suits the target well. I can't help but imagine if there's more that could be extracted from the data?? - specifically in the shadows. Perhaps a two point curve would push it further while controlling the highlights relative to the mid-tones. Overall, there is good details on display. Looking forward to seeing how you'll handle the HaRGB blends either with this image or your planned M8. A great result - well done.

Last edited by jase; 04-07-2009 at 06:48 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-07-2009, 06:43 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Looks good Marc. The Ha really brings out that loop. Might have to get one



Peter
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-07-2009, 07:33 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Thank you all for the positive feedback guys

Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
I can't help but imagine if there's more that could be extracted from the data?? - specifically in the shadows.
Yes Jase, I've always noticed I get this problem when saving greycale pics to JPEG. The TIFF 16 bits version does show a lot more nebulosity in the dark areas and better contrast in the light areas but the picture always darkens a bit when I save to JPEG for the web. Maybe the optimisation from TIFF 16 bits to JPEG 8 bits is not handled very well in PS or am I doing something wrong? The orginal is a TIFF 16bits.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-07-2009, 07:58 PM
TheDecepticon
Registered User

TheDecepticon is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,223
Good shot! Ha is awesome, always great depth and detail!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-07-2009, 08:57 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
That's a new re-introduction back into imaging Marc - I'd be happy with that. Sure, more data is always nice, but it's a never ending task then ;-)

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-07-2009, 10:03 PM
marc4darkskies's Avatar
marc4darkskies (Marcus)
Billions and Billions ...

marc4darkskies is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quialigo, NSW
Posts: 3,143
Nice job Marc - some good detail there! A bit more data would consolidate it though and give you more processing latitude. Bring on the colour!

Cheers, Marcus
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-07-2009, 11:14 PM
Prickly
Registered User

Prickly is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 347
Hi Marc,

Excellent image and a nice scale for the chip with the new 5 inch. Your hard work has surely paid off. Were you using a Meade DSI?

You might want to experiment a little with exposure times. I'm aiming at around 40 images per session to decrease the noise and working out from my imaging time how long to make the exposure. Works ok on bright objects. Dimmer ones will no doubt need longer. These chips are so sensitive its amazing how much detail comes out even at short exposures. Have seen galaxy shots posted on this website through a GSO 12 f5 with only 5sec shots - but lots of them made me think this may be a good way to go. If you are using a DSI with envisage the shorter subs will give you lots of images for drizzle to. Also less critical if some cloud drifts across etc.

Others (more knowledgable) may no doubt argue for sure stay at 10mins but I like experimenting around with things. My impressions are it does seem to work pretty well.

Cheers
David
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-07-2009, 05:59 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Yes Jase, I've always noticed I get this problem when saving greycale pics to JPEG. The TIFF 16 bits version does show a lot more nebulosity in the dark areas and better contrast in the light areas but the picture always darkens a bit when I save to JPEG for the web. Maybe the optimisation from TIFF 16 bits to JPEG 8 bits is not handled very well in PS or am I doing something wrong? The orginal is a TIFF 16bits.
Marc,
What is your working colour space?
-Its fine to process an image in aRGB, but you'll want to convert to sRGB at some point if the goal is web reproduction. As the gamut range is different between the two, there are some tasks best done in the desired final colour space.
Did you convert the image from greyscale to RGB?
- To be in compliance with colour space it should be converted to RGB and not left in greyscale.
Are you soft proofing the image against your calibrated monitor profile?
- Soft proofing can make it easier to visualise the effect of output based on device or colour space profiles. The concept and set up of soft proofing is too much to cover conclusively here, but in short it can assist you in the validation of your work. Maybe worth investigating.

Keep at it!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-07-2009, 08:26 AM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
very good resolutin with a 5 inch newt, well done


clive
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-07-2009, 10:27 AM
lesbehrens's Avatar
lesbehrens (Les)
Les

lesbehrens is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Qld
Posts: 525
nice
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-07-2009, 10:35 AM
Tamtarn's Avatar
Tamtarn
Barb and David

Tamtarn is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
Very nice Marc we look forward to seeing your M8. Has the flocking helped by the way?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-07-2009, 02:05 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Thank you all for the good feedback . Much appreciated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by marc4darkskies View Post
Nice job Marc - some good detail there! A bit more data would consolidate it though and give you more processing latitude. Bring on the colour!

Cheers, Marcus
Thanks Marcus . I'll stick more data in Ha to start with. I don't know how to blend in Ha yet. Fred's doing a talk next week at the club astro-meeting so I'll wait till then to hear it from the horse's mouth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prickly View Post
Hi Marc,

Excellent image and a nice scale for the chip with the new 5 inch. Your hard work has surely paid off. Were you using a Meade DSI?
Thanks David. Nope. I use a QHY8 on a newt (Celestron Nexstar 130SLT). My image scale at prime focus is approx 2.5 arc sec/pixel. Nice "widish" field but at the limit of undersampling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
...The concept and set up of soft proofing is too much to cover conclusively here, but in short it can assist you in the validation of your work. Maybe worth investigating. Keep at it!
Wow! Couple of things I seriously need to check ... Thanks for the offer Jase. I definitely have got more reading to do and will get back to you as not to waste your time with trivial questions. Good point. I never took notice that I'm in 16bits greyscale space.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy View Post
very good resolutin with a 5 inch newt, well done - clive
Thanks Clive - I bought an artifical star from astrozap - best thing I've ever done. I have setup my scope in the garage looking at the AS 60m away or so in a black bucket over a grassy field. It's great because you can do that anytime even during the day. I also bought Suiter's book. Still not understanding everything but I'm getting there slowly. Anyway the proof is in the pudding. Glad you've noticed. That's a $400.00 scope off the shelf .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamtarn View Post
Very nice Marc we look forward to seeing your M8. Has the flocking helped by the way?
Thanks guys - glad you like it. Has the flocking helped? HUGE difference. The improvement in contrast is massive. To give you an idea: shooting flats with my EL-sheet in the past, with a Ha filter I would need a minimum of 4s exposure to reach the desired level of 9000ADU. Now to reach the same level I have to do 11s exposures. Just shows how much stray light use to contribute to the final illumination pre-flocking.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-07-2009, 04:03 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Excellent Marc - a very pleasing image to me. I'm falling for Ha, and I really have to get a filter soon otherwise I'll go bonkers seeing takes like yours and not being able to sample some too.

It's nice to what you're getting out of the 5" newtonian. I'm keen to my new 6" to work, and on the basis of what you're achieving I can't wait.

Thanks Jase too, in reference to presenting mono web images in RGB colourspace. Good tip.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-07-2009, 04:56 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Thanks Chris. Yeah I can't wait to see what your new Tak's like on DSOs. Should be pretty cool.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-07-2009, 05:04 PM
Craig_L
Craig

Craig_L is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 558
Nice detail Marc. Look forward to the finished image with RGB. You've encouraged me to try my Baader Ha filter on this target with the DSLR.

Craig
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-07-2009, 08:54 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig_L View Post
Nice detail Marc. Look forward to the finished image with RGB. You've encouraged me to try my Baader Ha filter on this target with the DSLR.Craig
Sounds good. I wasn't aware they had Ha filters for DSLR. Looking forward to your shots too.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement