Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-06-2009, 08:11 PM
rick01's Avatar
rick01 (Roman)
Registered User

rick01 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nitra, Slovakia
Posts: 87
Jupiter from Slovakia

Hello all,

here is my attempt from my balcony in Nitra. Used 8"/f5 Newton, 10mm plossl, QHY5 mono and Panasonic FZ-18. Finally I tested my little camera for planetary imaging. I also tried for LRGB composite. As luminance I used image from QHY5 and for color layer, image from Panasonic FZ-18. I simply overlayed the L and RGB image in PS with 25% opacity for color layer. I know, that it is not the best way for LRGB compozite, but I still learning about image processing and camera settings.

Anyhow, can I ask how long exposures are u usually use for Jupiter imaging? I usually set around 15-25 ms with IR filter and gain around 60-85%, when seeing is 6/10 or better (FL around 4 meters).


Best Regards


Roman
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jup_bw.jpg)
18.4 KB52 views
Click for full-size image (jup_color.jpg)
26.0 KB58 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-06-2009, 08:32 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Hi Roman, excellent start to your Jupiter season. How high was Jupiter when you captured this? It must've been quite low?

Regarding exposure time, it really depends on your sky conditions, focal length, filter etc as you've probably worked out. Does your capture program have a histogram function?

If you use the histogram to set the exposure/gain so that the histogram is mostly full, without being overexposed, then that's about right.

What framerate does the camera capture at?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-06-2009, 09:06 PM
rick01's Avatar
rick01 (Roman)
Registered User

rick01 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nitra, Slovakia
Posts: 87
Thanks! Especially from you. Jupiter was around 20 degrees above horizon.

Yes, software I use also has histogram, but I dodn't use him very often. I set exposure by eye (I set image slightly dark - underexposed to freeze the seeing distortions as much as possible by shorter exposures). Now I know it wasn't good idea, but I still reading your perfect articles about planetary imaging and trying to set my camera up for the best results.

Camera desciption tells about 15fps @ 1280x1024px resolution increasing to 60fps @ 640x480px. But now I solving problem with low fps even with 1ms exposure (problem is propably in computer). Here is a simple graph of real fps, that camera produce on my laptop. I thing, that 640x480 or 320x240px should be usable for planetary.

And, sorry for my english.


Roman
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (fps.jpg)
30.8 KB8 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-06-2009, 11:46 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
640x480 is fine for planetary. You want the fastest frame rate you can use, while the histogram is still properly exposed.

Sometimes it's ok to trade off a little in the histogram for a faster framerate (like you said, freeze the seeing).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement