Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-05-2009, 08:01 AM
OneOfOne's Avatar
OneOfOne (Trevor)
Meteor & fossil collector

OneOfOne is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bentleigh
Posts: 1,386
Photo of telescope without an eyepiece!

I have some money invested with a managed fund and came home last night to see the latest issue of their investment advice magazine. The feature article on the front page was titled "Looking for the star performers" and had a picture of a guy looking at the skies with binoculars and a telescope on a tripod nearby. When I looked at it closely I could see the telescope didn't have an eyepiece in it I guess that is why they are fund managers and not astronomers.

I remember a number of years ago now they were talking on the news to a person from the fire brigade about house fires and he said "people should turn their appliances off at the power point, otherwise, over time the electricity builds up at the wall and can cause a fire"....I guess that is why firemen put out fires, which is their job, and people with electrical/electronic training do their job.

My wife was working at a local library when one of the public computers had "locked up", so she turned it off and counted to about 8 and turned it back on. One of the other staff said "no, no, no....you have to count to ten before you can turn it on again" Just another case of people not understanding something that is not "their job".

I guess we all have lots of stories like this.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-05-2009, 08:02 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
lol I received a copy of that magazine too, and also noticed there wasn't an eyepiece in there.

Pretty funny
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-05-2009, 10:30 AM
AstralTraveller's Avatar
AstralTraveller (David)
Registered User

AstralTraveller is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 3,819
I think they knew more about astronomy than you give them credit for. They were worried about dewing up the eyepiece and so had placed it somewhere warm and under cover until they had located the object in the binos and were ready to slew the scope to the object.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-05-2009, 11:07 AM
Gallifreyboy's Avatar
Gallifreyboy
Dr Who Nut

Gallifreyboy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 218
The recent performance of most managed funds, investment advisers etc. may cause you to reconsider the 'knowing their area' statement. Their accuracy and overall performance reminds me of the recent astronomy vs astrology thread.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-05-2009, 05:13 PM
PCH's Avatar
PCH (Paul)
Registered User

PCH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 2,313
Perhaps they knew there was no ep in the scope, because they didn't want to risk seeing the fund savings disappearing off into the distance
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-05-2009, 05:46 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
I've seen many poor examples of telescopes setup improperly in stock photo libraries, in fact it's rare to see a correctly set up telescope. Chances are the magazine got their image from a stock library.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-05-2009, 06:00 PM
Barrykgerdes
Registered User

Barrykgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
Talking about fake photo set ups. About 11 years ago there was a section on "Beyond 2000" showing the then relatively new goto telescopes. They used a LX200 classic. A dummy two star alignment was done looking out the window at Hadar and Acrux by setting the two alignment stars with the setting circles ( a little off camera). What a surprise I got when the screen said alignment successful. The studio was rather small, in a unit in Balmain but later when I saw the program it was surprisingly realistic.

Barry
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2009, 10:31 PM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,338
You know what their logic was?
Astronomers spend all their spare money on astro gear.
Therefore, no astronomers will have money to invest.
Therefore, no astronomers will receive this investment magazine.
They're thinking ... we can get away with not having an eyepiece and no-one will notice!
Cheeky.

Rob.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2009, 10:38 PM
stephenb's Avatar
stephenb (Stephen)
Registered User

stephenb is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: all over the shop...
Posts: 2,098
That's MY funds manager!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement