Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-01-2009, 10:46 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,284
Imaging Guiding Tip

When you set up PHD guiding pick a fairly bright star to guide on.

I set up an imaging session last night with the idea of taking 20 x 3 minute subs with my 120 f/5 achromat.

Spent the first 5-10 minutes after setting everything up (no permanent site) getting the focus as near as perfect with DSLR Focus actually I was happy with this works a treat.

Set up PHD on a smallish dull star at 3.5s exposures PHD calibrated and said guiding OK.

1st image taken came out fine, so I went inside for an hour, then when I came out again I found that PHD had lost the target star sometime during the second expsoure and all I had for the nights effort apart from the 1 good sub was a series of star trails.

I can only assume that the guding failure may have been caused through some low cloud coming out of nowhere blocking the light from the dim guide star I had picked.

So I suggest if you do set up like I did

a) pick a bright as possible guide star
b) wait until at least a quarter of the subs have been taken before leaving the mount too go it alone.


Last edited by TrevorW; 14-01-2009 at 01:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-01-2009, 01:48 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,810
Trevor I think you nailed it when you mentioned some possible haze or a cloud passing through, that will stuff it, it has happened to me.

Can i ask why you set the exposure at 3.5, I never go past 1.5 and even lower, and it will guide on the faintest star, if it stays clear of coarse.

No mate never leave your rig, just in case something happens, even like cloud, I sit next to mine the entire imaging run, and it has payed off at times, as some things do go wrong occasionally.

Trev, pick a medium star, not a very bright one, it will work much better.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-04-2009, 03:45 AM
scopemankit's Avatar
scopemankit (Chris)
just build it!

scopemankit is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cape Town - South Africa
Posts: 356
Leon,
You have hit the nail on the head! Although you may be auto imaging never leave the site. I have 30 hours of jazz set up in a computer just dedicated to music to ensure i don't get bored and a small hi fi playing it all the time I'm working.
Chris
Cape Town
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-04-2009, 06:04 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Indeed, I wouldn't be picking a very bright guide star. The brighter it is, the harder the algorithm needs to work to compute the centroid. As Leon points out, a star of medium brightness is best - certainly from an accuracy perspective.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-04-2009, 08:49 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
If your mount tracks reasonably well PHD should pick the guide star again when the sky clears provided it is still wihin the square search area. You can increase it from the default 15 to 25 so you provide for some kind of buffer in case of drift. I always leave my mount alone and go watch telly unless I'm close to do a meridian flip. I even fall asleep most of the time
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-04-2009, 12:45 PM
celstark (Craig)
Registered User

celstark is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17
Bright is good -- to a point. Just don't let that guide star saturate the CCD. If you do, you're loosing accuracy in determining where the star really is. If you're at 3.5s of exposure and it's just picking it out -- yea, probably a bit dim and dim enough that when some light clouds come by, all is lost. But Sirius -- not so good to guide on! (assuming you blokes can even see it)

Craig
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-04-2009, 01:03 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I'm too lazy to sit next to my scope while doing an imaging run. I often leave it running for hours at a time while I go back to bed

Occasionally i've lost some subs but being near the scope wouldn't have helped because it's been when blanket cloud has come over anyway.

And most times it's worked perfectly and I've caught up on some much needed sleep
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement