Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-04-2009, 04:54 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
Another Eta Rita

Target: NGC3372 Eta Carinae Nebula
Camera: Canon 350d modified Baader 2” Skyglow filter
Exposure Capture: DLSR Focus
Scope: Orion 80 ED
Mount: EQ6 Pro
Exposure Setting: Prime focus, ISO800 ICNR off Daylight WB
Exposures: 10 x 330s total 55m taken 03/04/09 between 8:30pm and 9:30pm
Seeing: Average, waxing gibbous moon 65%
Guiding: Orion Starshoot Autoguider using PHD
Focus: DSLR Focus
Stacking: DSS 10darks, 5flats, no bias applied stacking time 15-20 minutes
Processing: PS CS3, PS7

Info: Situated in the Carina
Carinae Nebula 10h 45m 59.52 bright diffuse nebula surrounding n Carinae easily visible with the naked eye. Discovered by Lacaille 1751-52. This giant diffuse nebula is one of the largest H II regions (composed of ionized hydrogen gas) in our Milky Way galaxy. The star forming nebula NGC 3372 has produced the very conspicuous peculiar star Eta Carinae, which is among the most massive and luminous stars in our Milky Way, and perhaps in the universe.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (eta c 030409 iss 2.jpg)
158.7 KB54 views
Click for full-size image (eta c 030409 55m adj dss rgb align 10sat iis.jpg)
190.9 KB49 views

Last edited by TrevorW; 04-04-2009 at 08:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-04-2009, 05:27 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
mmm, dont know what to make of this Trevor, core detail is saturated and it seems over curved generally, and loosing depth in the process
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-04-2009, 05:49 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
Have to agree on the first image (now deleted) was not that happy with it myself, the data's there and I had another go at processing I was trying a Baader Skyglow filter for the first time. The second image is probably a tad red but much better IMO

Fred any helpful suggestions

Thanks

Last edited by TrevorW; 04-04-2009 at 09:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-04-2009, 07:18 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
A larger image can be seen at

http://www.pbase.com/trevrw/astro

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-04-2009, 08:12 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Yes, thats better. The background must have been fairly high I guess given the moon was up, I dont have any experience with a skyglow filter, but it seems to help. Some stars appear a bit fat and saturated for that FL, or is that the filter?. Perhaps some short exposures (for smaller stars) could be selectively blended in in PS.

Other than the big stars, which are pretty distracting, that repro is pretty good.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-04-2009, 09:06 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
No idea what's causing the bloated stars anyone got a suggestion.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-04-2009, 09:15 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
On reflection Trevor, I dont think its that bad. Id be happy with that. In fact id say you should be proud of it, sorry to cause concern
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement