Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-03-2009, 11:53 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
NGC 4945 Centaurus

Hi,

this just captured and processed tonight before the
seeing started to deteriorate.
Also, a dark artifact is visible at the bottom , even after
an aggressive pixel map adjustment. It may be on the lights.

My first ever capture of this quite large fuzzy with this setup.

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc4945lum_qm_lapl_hist_titled.jpg)
132.1 KB59 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-03-2009, 04:53 AM
JD2439975's Avatar
JD2439975 (Justin)
Cloud hater

JD2439975 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Conondale QLD
Posts: 493
Is that a Klingon Bird of Prey decloaking in the lower right corner??
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-03-2009, 05:50 PM
skies2clear
Registered User

skies2clear is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 238
No actually the remains of one after a photon torpedo hit
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-03-2009, 06:05 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
Not bad Steve

You might like to start increasing the exposure times a bit though, just to get better signal to noise ratio..?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-03-2009, 07:08 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Not bad Steve

You might like to start increasing the exposure times a bit though, just to get better signal to noise ratio..?

Mike
Thanks Mike,
Hopefully I can revisit 4945 soon and get more frames in the stack.
I know a good 200-300 in good seeing drops that noise floor with
my method (highly unscientific and totally un-researched )

Longer exposures are quite a problem as I've mentioned in previous
posts like these...hopefully I can do a set of maybe 10sec stuff
one night if I pick the night.

PS didn't realise how bad and grainy the noise in this image was until today
when I viewed the post on an LCD. (capture was viewed and posted
looking on a CRT in dome). Have to remember that!
Always a pleasure getting feedback from you Mike,
appreciated,

cheers,

Steve

Last edited by kinetic; 18-03-2009 at 07:11 PM. Reason: CRT vs LCD mon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement