Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterM
Hey Ron,
Congratulations, you now seem to have your very own critic or fan. I mean anyone who reads just about everything you post and then has a comment must be either a critic or fan. right?
PeterM.
|
Actually it is only if it is from the BBC....
The errors of this rabid Brit organisation is certainly akin to tabloid journalism. It really cheese me off - especially when other sites do so very much better.
Frankly, I really don't know what Ron sees in promoting the BBC site all the time. Knowing the total garbage, the bias, and the open dishonesty that is produce nearly all the time by this disgusting website - and the blanketed blatant political agenda behind it - well you have to say something.
Frankly this Brit site is mostly absolute crap, and more often than not, I have already read about the subject elsewhere. Also these alternative sites are often presented with a far more balanced appraisal.
Ron's contributions hasn't really been all negative though... I really do enjoy his sometimes insightful observational reports and observational posts, especially some of the ones like on planetary nebulae. IMO if he would just stay on this good stuff - which he is both proficient and knowledgeable about - their wouldn't be a problem. If he did more of this in posts, then I'd certainly would be a better fanatical "fan."
* NOTE: The one thing I personally object to in this article (and the media in general) is the disgusting "pimping" of an established grave site prostituted by Mrs. Poncher. Having no respect for the dead, especially if you are related to the deceased, is wrong. IMO she is really one very sick puppy!