Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-02-2009, 09:24 AM
binofied
Registered User

binofied is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Auckland New Zealand
Posts: 44
Tapered dew shield?

I am putting a 450mm long dew shield onto my 10" Meade F10 OTA. It is actually running at F6.3 or 1600mm with a celestron focal reducer.

What size should the open end be?

The normal tubes from Meade are 300mm and parallel. However this is for F10.

Also i am going to make it like a baffled tube with rings about 20mm wide and 300mm ID then covering the outside with balsa sheet. There will be three rings bottom mid and end of tube. This way there will be less reflection from the sides as they will be in the shade of the rings.

So is 300mm wide enough at the open end? Or does it need to be a tapered tube?

Dave Moorhouse
Auckland NZ
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-02-2009, 01:33 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by binofied View Post
I am putting a 450mm long dew shield onto my 10" Meade F10 OTA. It is actually running at F6.3 or 1600mm with a celestron focal reducer.

What size should the open end be?

The normal tubes from Meade are 300mm and parallel. However this is for F10.

Also i am going to make it like a baffled tube with rings about 20mm wide and 300mm ID then covering the outside with balsa sheet. There will be three rings bottom mid and end of tube. This way there will be less reflection from the sides as they will be in the shade of the rings.

So is 300mm wide enough at the open end? Or does it need to be a tapered tube?

Dave Moorhouse
Auckland NZ
Hi Dave

I use a astrozap flexible dew shield on my LX200 10" and this also runs parrallel to the tube. I use my scope at F10, F6.3 and F3.3. The dewsheild does not interfear in any way so tapering is not necessary. Why would you bother to baffle the dew shield??? Mine does a great job of keeping stray light out and you really do not want to add any extra weight to the tube espeacially if there is little or no gain optically. The OTA is well baffled in anycase.

Ciao Mark
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2009, 08:16 AM
binofied
Registered User

binofied is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Auckland New Zealand
Posts: 44
The reason for the baffle idea is that the existing Meade shield if you look down it at an oblique angle there is a lot of reflection off the black painted inside. The paint is not very matt. I want to use it mainly to stop stray light entering the system. I am often using it during almost full moon with the moon only 15 deg away to take measurements for gravitational microlensing science work to find extra solar planets.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2009, 09:55 AM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Fair enough. You might like to try the astro zap shield as it has no reflection from the inside surface and is much lighter then the meade dew shield. You could always use felt inside the meade version which would stop the reflection and is nice and flat so there is no extra obstruction.

Ciao Mark
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2009, 10:36 AM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,352
I made one out of acetate sheet...was very light and you can get it laminated with film the same blue as your OTA.....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement