Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-12-2008, 07:03 PM
drahyrt's Avatar
drahyrt (Steve)
Registered User

drahyrt is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Port Macquarie
Posts: 15
Magnitude, getting a handle on it,

Hi all,
Just trying to get a handle on what I can expect to see and not see, so I'm not looking for things I'm never going to see....
I understand it depends on my location, time of night, surrounding contamination of light, eyepieces etc etc etc,

I have a 150mm reflector.

ON AVERAGE in regional NSW, what should I expect to see down to with an average quality reflector with average eyepieces?

I did a search on this forum, no luck but found this link to magnitude, but thought I could get a real perspective.

http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/icq/MagScale.html

(My main motive - to look at stellarium, and pick DSO's to find based on what approximate magnitude they are and what equip I currently have).

Based on the harvard site, I might be lucky with "good" viewing conditions to see mag 10-11??? or am I dreaming? (insert "the Castle" film quotes here).

Ok so hit me with the reality,
TIA
Steve
Newbgazer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-12-2008, 07:11 PM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
You can see 11th mag stars with a 60mm refractor and easily with a 80mm refractor or binos.

A 6" newt will give you stars about 13th mag I believe depending on you visual accuity and seeing conditions

http://www.twcac.org/Tutorials/limit...tude_table.htm

http://www.go.ednet.ns.ca/~larry/astro/maglimit.html

Last edited by Ian Robinson; 07-12-2008 at 07:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-12-2008, 07:36 PM
drahyrt's Avatar
drahyrt (Steve)
Registered User

drahyrt is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Port Macquarie
Posts: 15
Wow great links,
THANK YOU.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2008, 10:49 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
With DSO it is difficult to know which objects will be visible just by looking at their magnitude. While a magnitude 9 star will be easily visible because the light is a single point, a magnitude 9 DSO such as a galaxy will have that light spread over a larger area. Imagine taking that same star and defocusing it until the light is spread over the same area in the eyepiece as the galaxy, I'm sure you can understand what I am saying.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2008, 11:28 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
... Easy, get a star map that has a legend to what size dot equates to then start star hopping untill you cant see them anymore! Heypresto. Do the hard yards first learn a bit while your there.

Get Astronomy 2009 from Quasar publishing or where i brought it for 29.95 Australian Geographic (yes i missed the bulk order boat on ISS.. ) but this has some good star maps.!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-12-2008, 08:05 PM
drahyrt's Avatar
drahyrt (Steve)
Registered User

drahyrt is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Port Macquarie
Posts: 15
Hi Andrew,
Yes that does make sense, cheers.

I have astromomy 2009, and just waiting for a trip to Syd to get a better star map. Thanks Brendan.

You all have helped me get a handle on it, just after a rough guide though which is what you've done, thanks.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2008, 12:14 AM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Robinson View Post
You can see 11th mag stars with a 60mm refractor and easily with a 80mm refractor or binos.

A 6" newt will give you stars about 13th mag I believe depending on you visual accuity and seeing conditions

http://www.twcac.org/Tutorials/limit...tude_table.htm

http://www.go.ednet.ns.ca/~larry/astro/maglimit.html
I looked at these tables.
I have reasonable eyesight and very dark skies. With my scope (200mm) I have just seen pluto when it was at mag 13.9 a few years ago. The table gives "14.0 or 15.2" as the limits for my scope size. I think the 14 is pretty close. To image a 15.2 mag star with a reasonable SN ratio would need a ~10 sec exposure minimum. I think this value is unrealistic for visual limits.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2008, 12:15 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
there are also some very comprehensive star maps avalible from this site, have a lookseee around youll find them
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-12-2008, 07:49 AM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal View Post
With DSO it is difficult to know which objects will be visible just by looking at their magnitude. While a magnitude 9 star will be easily visible because the light is a single point, a magnitude 9 DSO such as a galaxy will have that light spread over a larger area. Imagine taking that same star and defocusing it until the light is spread over the same area in the eyepiece as the galaxy, I'm sure you can understand what I am saying.
Yes extended "fuzzies" make the limiting mag more so so. Probably take 1-1.5 mag off that max for fuzzies if you are trying to see them , even more if the contrast if bad , ie light polluted , moonlit , bad or no=existant baffling and flokking , maybe take 2 or 3 mags off ....

More subjective , as often tricks like averted vision will help.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement