Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 27-07-2008, 05:18 PM
miki63au's Avatar
miki63au
Registered User

miki63au is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 388
12" Binte/Adrews/ or 6"achro

Hi everyone.
My cass. scope project going slow, and I need something right now.
I tossing between Bintels white 12" dob or Andrews GSO dob.
What is the different between them?
(I like the Bintel becouse its white...)

Also Andrews Com. selling the 6" achro OTA for about the $800 as well.
How is the Chinese refractors would compare to?

The 6" achro used to be legendary because of higher contrast than mirror based systems (for equal price). How is nowadays the quality of this doublets? Would Andrews Com. exchange it if optically compromised, like spherical aberration or astigmatism?

Any opinion?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-07-2008, 05:30 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
I'm pretty sure that there is no difference between the 12" dobs except the colour and a couple of extras. They are both GSO scopes except Bintel have renamed them.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-07-2008, 05:59 PM
Satchmo's Avatar
Satchmo
Registered User

Satchmo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by miki63au View Post
The 6" achro used to be legendary because of higher contrast than mirror based systems (for equal price). How is nowadays the quality of this doublets?
Miklos, If you put a 6" off-axis aperture stop on a 12" Newt you'll see superior images to a 6" F8 Chinese refractor. I have two 6" F8 Achromats and consider that the star images are looking soft and distinctly yellowish with a 12mm eyepiece, due to Chromatic Aberration.

A stopped-down Newt has no such limitations. Its great to be able to remove an aperture stop on a larger Newt, when you want to see some detail in deep sky objects.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-07-2008, 06:01 PM
GrahamL's Avatar
GrahamL
pro lumen

GrahamL is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ballina
Posts: 3,265
I dont know if you get a choice in the colour .. the white ones do look very scientific .. but mine at times had a habit of catching a bit of stray light around the focuser and bounceing it into your eye ..so I painted the top bit black .. more annoying than a big problem..they are both the same though.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-07-2008, 06:17 PM
miki63au's Avatar
miki63au
Registered User

miki63au is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satchmo View Post
I have two 6" F8 Achromats ... .

Fair enough, but I read everywhere that 6" synta not bad for the money.
Just need a bit of luck to get a well corrected one tho.
You have two ? Have you tried to optimise it by changing the spacers?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-07-2008, 06:17 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
I have a saxon 6" achro and I can say the views are nice untill you go to something very bright, or you use too much magnification....

As has been mentioned, the Andrews/bintel 12" are the same unit. whichever takes your fancy at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-07-2008, 07:27 PM
Satchmo's Avatar
Satchmo
Registered User

Satchmo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by miki63au View Post
Have you tried to optimise it by changing the spacers?
These Synta refracters are air -spaced I would assume optimally. Even 30 years ago an F8 6" achromat would have been a rarity, becasue of its camparatively poor color correction. if you are used to Newtonians with good optics, a 6" achromat loses its appeal after the initial thrill of contrasty views of bright star clusters at low power with them wears off.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-07-2008, 12:08 AM
toyos
Registered User

toyos is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by miki63au View Post
Hi everyone.

Also Andrews Com. selling the 6" achro OTA for about the $800 as well.
How is the Chinese refractors would compare to?

Any opinion?

$800?? They were $599 last month. I bought one just to find out more about it and sold it again after 2 weeks. The images were contrasty (as expected) showing good definition and fairly sharp for an achro but the chromatic aberration was apparent and some star images did look quite yellowish. The CA also affected the apparent sharpness to some extent. Compared side by side to unmodified 12" GSO & 10" Skywatcher dobs, the contrast of the refractor was way better. I tried putting an aperture stop on the unmodified 12" GSO dob and the result was nowhere as good as the 6" refractor (chromatic aberration aside). Overall, despite the false colours, I'll choose this refractor over an unmodified budget 10" dob.

Last edited by toyos; 28-07-2008 at 02:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28-07-2008, 12:14 AM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by miki63au View Post
Hi everyone.

(I like the Bintel becouse its white...)

Any opinion?
Hi,

the Andrews GSO 12 that I got about a month ago is
white.....looks beautiful.

See here:
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=34116

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28-07-2008, 08:21 AM
miki63au's Avatar
miki63au
Registered User

miki63au is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by toyos View Post
$800?? I bought one just to find out more about it and sold it again after 2 weeks. .... . Compared side by side to unmodified 12" GSO & 10" Skywatcher dobs, the contrast of the refractor was way better. ....nowhere as good as the 6" refractor .... Overall, despite the false colours, I'll choose this refractor over an unmodified budget 10" dob.

way did you sold it? what you mean "unmodified" dob?

I like the idea of having a 6" refractor, but the 12" dob if the mirror is ok
probably more useful. I think both system cop out around 200 mags unless
it's exceptionalY good sample. Actually I want both of them, use the refractor for wide field and the 12" for fainter DSO...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28-07-2008, 08:53 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
a 6" F/8 refractor wont give wide field views....

it will have a focal length of 1200mm, the 12" reflector will have 1500mm..

For widefield shots you really want less than 1000mm.. something in a 6" F/5 would be great at 760mm FL.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28-07-2008, 10:21 AM
Satchmo's Avatar
Satchmo
Registered User

Satchmo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by toyos View Post
I tried putting an aperture stop on the unmodified 12" GSO dob and the result was nowhere as good as the 6" refractor (chromatic aberration aside).
If you found an effectively unobstructed 6" F10 reflector to be inferior to a 6" F8 refractor then you must have a really poor quality mirror.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28-07-2008, 01:06 PM
toyos
Registered User

toyos is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satchmo View Post
If you found an effectively unobstructed 6" F10 reflector to be inferior to a 6" F8 refractor then you must have a really poor quality mirror.

That's what I thought - poor quality mirror, but I star tested the scopes inside & outside focus, they seemed okay (acceptable). Did you fully flock & baffle your 12" GSO dob? I never bothered modifying my dobs (I don't even have enough time to use them) and I've sold them anyway, even my supposedly 'low-contrast' SCT's always showed better contrast than the dobs in spite of the larger CO's.

This is the reason why doubling the horsepower of your car does not make it go twice as fast. There are many other factors that affect it.

Last edited by toyos; 29-07-2008 at 12:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 28-07-2008, 01:46 PM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
It's a no brainer.

Go for a 12" reflector.

You can see more.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28-07-2008, 06:50 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Else - Spend more money and buy a 12" APO
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 28-07-2008, 09:14 PM
anj026's Avatar
anj026
Plyscope

anj026 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 532
At the risk of going off topic, wouldn't a 15 or 16 inch aperture newtonian be required to achieve an un-obstructed 6 inch aperture with an off axis mask?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 28-07-2008, 09:57 PM
miki63au's Avatar
miki63au
Registered User

miki63au is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 388
Good point Andy,
how is your 6" f15 ? Is it a D&G?

Anyone had a chance to see a 6" Chinese achro with "chromacor" ??
The thing is that a GSO 12" mirror is about the price range of the achro,
so my logic is we should compare it to that. Zambuto quality is not fair...
I think the average 12" and the achro will top out at 200 mags.
The mirror is because the lack of figure and polishing, the achro is too
fast and possibly not well corrected. Still, 6" and no obstruction....
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 29-07-2008, 12:04 AM
toyos
Registered User

toyos is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by anj026 View Post
At the risk of going off topic, wouldn't a 15 or 16 inch aperture newtonian be required to achieve an un-obstructed 6 inch aperture with an off axis mask?

That's right, you can turn a 12" dob into a roughly unobstructed 4.8" reflector. Alternatively, you can make a multiple aperture stop with 2-4 holes which kind of re-introduces the central obstruction but could slightly increase contrast (by darkening the background) & sharpness. Both methods didn't work that great for me. Also keep in mind that multi-coated lenses transmit more light than combinations of mirrors, for some reason most people don't seem to take this into account when comparing refractors to reflectors.

Last edited by toyos; 29-07-2008 at 11:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 29-07-2008, 12:08 AM
anj026's Avatar
anj026
Plyscope

anj026 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 532
Hi Miklos, my scope uses a D&G lens in a home made tube. It is a lot of fun but not practical for everyone.
I have not used either a 12" dob or a 6" f8 achromat but they both seem like great value for $800 and I expect you could use one for a year or so and then sell it on for more than half what you paid. If you prefer deep sky go for the dob.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 30-07-2008, 09:04 PM
tnott's Avatar
tnott
Oblonnygox

tnott is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 221
Quote:
Originally Posted by miki63au View Post
Good point Andy,
how is your 6" f15 ? Is it a D&G?

Anyone had a chance to see a 6" Chinese achro with "chromacor" ??
The thing is that a GSO 12" mirror is about the price range of the achro,
so my logic is we should compare it to that. Zambuto quality is not fair...
I think the average 12" and the achro will top out at 200 mags.
The mirror is because the lack of figure and polishing, the achro is too
fast and possibly not well corrected. Still, 6" and no obstruction....
You will see more detail with the 12" (if the seeing allows) central obstruction or no.

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/howto...tml?c=y&page=5
http://legault.club.fr/obstruction.html

Portability, cool-down time and convenience are other important considerations though.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement