Quote:
Originally Posted by Quark
Chuck tell me that due to the physiological effects of the lack of oxygen on our eyes (there is 40% less oxygen at 14,000 ft), that the limiting visual mag at the summit would be no better and more likely worse than from a dark site at sea level.
|
Hi Trevor,
Thanks for the report and I had heard before of this law of diminishing returns
for altitudes over 10,000 feet as far as the effect of the lack of oxygen has
on visual acuity.
Even if there are real physiological reasons for the visual acuity dropping,
all it takes is for those other common woes at altitude, like a splitting headache,
shortness of breath, dehydration, etc, to kick in and put a real damper on what
otherwise would have been a great night's observing in ideal seeing conditions.
Ironically and apparently for reasons not completely understood, altitude sickness
tends to affect fit, young males more than other demographics. Though it may
not be wise to therefore take on a regimen of a meat pie and two beers for
lunch everyday for a year before going to the top of Mauna Kea in the hope one
might better escape the effects of altitude, it is nice to know that you don't
have to be a twenty year old bandana wearing mountain climbing champion either.
Really looking forward to your stories. How did the observation runs go
and how was the weather and seeing on the nights in question?
Best regards
Gary