Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-05-2008, 07:19 PM
andrew's Avatar
andrew
Registered User

andrew is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 95
Iss 14/05/08

Decided to get the camera out tonight for this passover of the International Space Station, as it was a relatively bright pass, at magnitude -2.0. Pretty happy with the photo, although any ideas on how to remove the antenna at the bottom and still maintain integrity in the image?

Details:
Canon EOS 400D
85s exposure at F/5.6 ISO: 800
Using the kit lens, 18-55mm at 18mm

Original:
http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?i...0issm20zd1.jpg
Alternate Link (469kb)

Here also is a render, adjustments made to brightness/contrast/colours (537kb): Link

Last edited by andrew; 14-05-2008 at 08:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-05-2008, 07:50 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
your link points to the thumbnail image...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-05-2008, 07:56 PM
andrew's Avatar
andrew
Registered User

andrew is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
your link points to the thumbnail image...
Fixed now.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-05-2008, 08:20 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
mmm, that was a pretty ordinary, frantic, randomly chaotic link (did it cause that pop up?).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-05-2008, 08:23 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
OK, I get it, clicking zoomed, umm, the white line dissappears behind the roof, the antanea didnt effect it really. mmm........
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-05-2008, 08:27 PM
andrew's Avatar
andrew
Registered User

andrew is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 95
Ok not really sure what's going on, so I've put an alternate link to the image in the first post, and also added a render, hope they both work okay..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-05-2008, 08:35 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Oh dear, Murhpy got right in there.

Good luck :-)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-05-2008, 08:37 PM
Bloodbean's Avatar
Bloodbean (Troy)
Registered User

Bloodbean is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 134
Seems to work okay for me! Nice shot, I always love seeing the ISS overhead.

For 85 seconds at f/5.6 I'd probably go with ISO 400 though myself.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-05-2008, 08:40 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Nice image! I wished I had the SLR out for the last pass over brisbane...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14-05-2008, 08:45 PM
duncan's Avatar
duncan
Duncan

duncan is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weipa FNQld
Posts: 1,091
Hey Andrew,
Nice shots, but the crap that came up on my screen does not fit well with me.
Piss the crap advertisements off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cheers,
Duncan
Ps. If i wanted to play poker i'd go to the casino!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 14-05-2008, 08:56 PM
andrew's Avatar
andrew
Registered User

andrew is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan View Post
Hey Andrew,
Nice shots, but the crap that came up on my screen does not fit well with me.
Piss the crap advertisements off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cheers,
Duncan
Ps. If i wanted to play poker i'd go to the casino!
Wow, I'm amazed...I click both links and I see zero advertising I assume this was from the Imageshack link? If so, I know where not to upload pics in the future.. Is the alternate link okay? Hope it is, glad you liked the pic.

Also, yes ISO of 400 would have been better, but I wasn't sure how long exposure I wanted until it actually started coming over, so I played it safe and left it on 800..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement