Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:31 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
M104 - latest DSI attempts

Spent most of last night trying to get a reasonable image of M104. My polar alignment wasn't good so I stuck to short subs (15 secs) but stacked a lot of them (100+).

I've tried a few different processing options including Envisage stacked, RGB combine and Deep Sky stacker. Here's the Envisage Stacked (120x15 secs) and Deep Sky Stacker versions. There are a lot more subs (6 times) in the DSS version as I was able to pull together all the individual exposures. The RGB was a waste of time. The extra subs has improved the image compared to last weeks attempts.

Thanks for looking.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M104_L_2.jpg)
95.1 KB86 views
Click for full-size image (M104_DSS.jpg)
82.4 KB77 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-04-2008, 04:28 PM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
Thats much better Peter! Some detail starting to show!
Tracking looks much better this time as well!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-04-2008, 07:46 AM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Thanks Gary. I had another go at the RGB this morning - A bit of mis-alignment of the red channel.

Peter
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M104_RGB2.jpg)
182.6 KB50 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-04-2008, 02:17 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Hi Peter those mono images are showing some nice depth and clarity.

Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-04-2008, 07:46 PM
dcalleja's Avatar
dcalleja
Registered User

dcalleja is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 515
Peter - definitely getting better each time. Not sure why its such a hard object to image. Its mag 9.5 but seems to image like something much fainter.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-04-2008, 08:18 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Thanks Ric & Dan - don't know what it is about this galaxy but I guess I should remember it is 41 million ly away. I'm probably just getting fussy!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-04-2008, 12:48 AM
cwjames's Avatar
cwjames
Registered User

cwjames is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 73
Hi Peter,

I like your M104. I took this target on Friday night too but I like yours much better, its nice and smooth compared to mine.

http://www.cwjames.info/astro/galler...galaxy-003.php

Nice work peter, I will do mine again !

Thanks

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-04-2008, 12:42 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Chris,

Nice image - what equipment did you use?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-04-2008, 04:32 PM
cwjames's Avatar
cwjames
Registered User

cwjames is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 73
Hi Peter,

The equipment is:
Imaging scope - 10inch Meade LX200R
Guide Scope - SkyWatcher ED80 piggy backed on LX200R
Guide Camera - DSI Pro (Mono)
Imaging Camera - Canon 20D DSLR

Depending on the FOV required for the target, I either use the 20D on the LX200R or the SkyWatcher ED80 and reverse the guide scope. I even use the DSI to take images using the Drizy function which takes nice pictures in its own right.

Thanks

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14-04-2008, 06:05 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Hi Peter

Very nice with a DSI

Couldnt help myself with a quick fiddle (round white stars), sorry, I lost some of them
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Peters M104_RGB2 B.jpg)
124.0 KB22 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 14-04-2008, 06:14 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Chris, also nice, but a bit noisy . A round star fiddle .
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Chris galaxy-003 b.jpg)
87.3 KB15 views
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 14-04-2008, 07:55 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Thanks Fred - what's the round white star fiddle?

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 14-04-2008, 09:17 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
In PS, select all, then copy (contl C), then paste (contl V) . then you will have 2 layers . Set the top layer to "darken", select the shift tool, move it with the keyboard arrow keys in the desired direction to make the stars round (you are moving the top layer relative to the lower layer, any difference is "darkend"). When done (with round stars), select layers merge down to make a single layer again (thats the round star stuff done). Then, in yr case, select "colour select", and click on a star, then click on Add selection tool in colour select box and click on a few dimmer stars and then adjust slider until you have all the stars selected, then select modify and increase the selection by 4 pixels or so, then feather the selection by 2 pixels (to smooth further processing) You will notice all the stars are selected, but also the galaxy. Select lasso tool, then (with ALT key down, the cursor will show a - symbol) draw round the galaxy and realease the mouse key, the Galaxy will be excluded from the selection. What you have now is only the stars selected. Now select (Image, adjustments, desaturate) and all colour in the selection (stars) will be B/W. this last step is cheating, eliminates any colour in the stars to white.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 14-04-2008, 09:29 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Thanks Fred - how did you work out this processing routine?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 14-04-2008, 10:49 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
All nicked from others smarter than myself . Ron wodaskis zone book springs to mind. And after fiddling with PS for a while, you get a feel for whats possible. I might add tho, that the better the data collected, the less you need of this trickery.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 16-04-2008, 10:41 AM
winensky's Avatar
winensky
Registered User

winensky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ballarat Vic
Posts: 268
Agreed about this being a tough one to get right. It always seems to take much more exposure time than it should. Good work and I hope you can get your alignment sorted. Tripods can be frustrating creatures.

Kind regards
Matt
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 16-04-2008, 12:28 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Thanks Fred and Matt. I need to spend a lot more time in Photoshop - there is so much to learn.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement