Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-04-2008, 08:47 PM
2020BC's Avatar
2020BC (Bill Christie)
Bill Christie

2020BC is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 472
Scorpion Cluster NGC6231

LXD-75 SN-8 MPCC 14x30secs ISO1600 guided

1:1 crop is on the left.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ScorpioNGC6231TRY2SN8MPCC14x30sec1600ISOGuided06Apr06ICE1280.jpg)
193.9 KB40 views
Click for full-size image (ScorpioNGC6231TRY2SN8MPCC14x30sec1600ISOGuided06Apr06ICEWider1280.jpg)
196.7 KB29 views

Last edited by 2020BC; 10-04-2008 at 09:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-04-2008, 08:58 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Nice image Bill,

those SN scopes are real performers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2008, 09:22 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
You know I've often thought about getting a 10" SN Bill. You've just about got me convinced.

Any back focus issues with the canon? Any need for field flatteners or does the corrector plate do the job well?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-04-2008, 09:42 PM
2020BC's Avatar
2020BC (Bill Christie)
Bill Christie

2020BC is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 472
Cheers folks. The SN-8 goes alright. If you buy one you MUST get a new focuser. The rack and pinion is a shocker. It's a real pain to focus at f/4. It causes me a lot of grief. A good crayford with 10:1 microfocuser would be a dream. The design of the SN reduces coma, so it is less than for a standard newtonian of the same focal length. Noticeable coma still exists at the edge of frame. I'm experimenting with an MPCC Coma corrector which seems to do the trick.

With a 10% SN I wouldn't mount it on an LXD-75. I feel a 10" would require an Atlas (EQ-6) or better if you're also mounting a guidescope. There's a smidgeon (about 1cm, maybe less) of in-focus left when you put a Canon camera at prime-focus. Always enough room to add filters, etc. and stay in focus, but there's not enough room to insert an off-axis guider.

Hope this helps.

Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders] View Post
You know I've often thought about getting a 10" SN Bill. You've just about got me convinced.

Any back focus issues with the canon? Any need for field flatteners or does the corrector plate do the job well?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2008, 10:13 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
A great looking image Bill, lots of colours in the stars and nice and sharp.

We dont see enough cluster images so its always good to see a post.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement