Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-03-2008, 05:10 PM
iceworks's Avatar
iceworks
Brett

iceworks is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Swan Hill
Posts: 49
Who has the best scope?

I've been having lots of fun with my first scope, a Meade ETX 125, but I wan't to see more! Should I go Dobsonian, RC, SC or Apo, and what's a good size versus acceptable price for mere mortals? I'm not so fussed about astrophotography, more just enjoying the sky real-time. Love to hear the views of members with experience.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2008, 05:18 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
look out the Dob guys are circling.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2008, 05:30 PM
§AB
Its only a column of dust

§AB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Iceland
Posts: 761
Get a dob. Collectively I paid $1200 for my dobs (although secondhand) and they both have excellent optics.

You can pick up a new Bintel 12" for 900 bucks or a 10" for $600. That's cheaper than most 4" refractors, SCTs and MCTs and you'll see a hell of a lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2008, 05:47 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
DOB..... 16 inch or bigger cheapish (3k) and BANG for your buck

12 inch for under a grand cant go wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-03-2008, 06:18 PM
goober's Avatar
goober (Doug)
No obs, raising Harrison

goober is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 796
My scope history was 8" dob (good, kept it until mid-2007), ETX-90 (eh), ED100 (okay), 12" dob (okay, but a logistical beast). My world then got rocked by a 4" alt-az Apo that I was allowed to use for a month. After that, I had to have one. Logged nearly 50+ sessions with it in nine months.

If you want to see "more", get a big dob. If you want to see "more often", that's another story
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2008, 06:47 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
The best scope is the one that will get the most use!

The relative merits of each type/kind of scope are just that...relative.

The best scope is the one that fits your lifestyle (budget) and viewing habits.

How much do you want to spend and how far will you need to carry it for dark skies?

While not helpful to your question...I do not think that there is any "one size fits all" scope that is best...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2008, 07:01 PM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
I have two scopes, an 8" and a 13". Guess which one gives the best views, then guess which one gets used the most.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2008, 08:16 PM
iceworks's Avatar
iceworks
Brett

iceworks is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Swan Hill
Posts: 49
It sounds as if portability and ease of use are big factors. Makes sense seeing I spend as much time with binoculars as with my scope. Perhaps a reasonable Apo might be the go. Although would I see any more than with my ETX 125? Don't know much about Apo's and have never looked through one. Any feedback would be great.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2008, 09:16 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceworks View Post
It sounds as if portability and ease of use are big factors.
Yup it may be a factor in how often you will bother to look. Having said that, many people put smallish scopes on heavy cumbersome eq mounts which makes them a whole lot less portable and convenient than a simple dob or other alt-az mounted scope.

Quote:
Perhaps a reasonable Apo might be the go. Although would I see any more than with my ETX 125? Don't know much about Apo's and have never looked through one. Any feedback would be great.
How much you will see is determined by the ability of the scope to collect light.
In other words the greater the aperture, the more you will see. You will see more in a 150mm newtonian than in an etx 125 or a 4 or 5 inch apo on dso's simply because you are collecting more light and delivering it to your eyeball.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-03-2008, 09:18 PM
mark3d
Registered User

mark3d is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 268
i came to the conclusion that with a scope, to use a motorbike analogy, i couldnt get the weekend cruising BMW and the everyday scooter in one package!

so i bought a dob, in the future i will get a travel scope!

as someone said binocs are the ultimate in portability.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-03-2008, 09:33 PM
Domol's Avatar
Domol (Domenic)
Bring on the night!

Domol is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dingley Village
Posts: 162
What ever you get, get GOTO functionality too. Then you get more objects per night! The more objects, the more you enjoy it....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-03-2008, 11:56 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domol View Post
What ever you get, get GOTO functionality too. Then you get more objects per night! The more objects, the more you enjoy it....
Or a DSC...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-03-2008, 09:07 AM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
Or, maybe you will be one of us strange group who actually enjoy the hunt
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-03-2008, 10:16 AM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,901
I would imagine I have spent 150 hours just trying to optimise my mount (pointing and tracking) and improve focus and remove flexure.

So instead of viewing, I have been tuning for ages - and its all from lack of documentation on a Japanese mount. Only through serendipity and perseverance did I start to work out what I needed! To me I really want convenience, quality and repeatability in my viewing and photography - so all the work goes into getting the base platform right to achieve these aims.

So my needs are likely very different from yours. Once I have the mount perfected it's the optics and then the CCDs I'll work on. If I wanted to take my kids camping and show them the stars I likely go large binoculars and a quality APO on a smaller goto mount or a truss dob. Now if I wanted real high end imaging - I'd select a permanent dark site, a high end mount and high end apo's. At the moment I use the best mount I can afford, a decent SCT and reasonable refractors into a DSLR - so budget optimised choices all around!

Who has the best gear is a very broad question because its subject to needs, purpose and constrains like, time, travel, skies, targets, portability, finance, ease of use, etc... of the user!

Last edited by g__day; 06-03-2008 at 10:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-03-2008, 11:19 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,428
the best scope is the one that you love! I love all my scopes, 2 ed80s, 8" SCT, 10" SCT, 16" lightbridge, 5" M500, PST, and a 8" newt R200SS
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-03-2008, 11:51 AM
PhilW's Avatar
PhilW
Registered User

PhilW is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 283
My experience is that it depends a lot on your observing context.

I lived for five years in Washington, DC & New York, where the light pollution & atmosphere were both terrible. So I had a small Vixen refractor which I could carry up onto the roof of my apartment building. When I returned to Australia in 2005, I decided I had to have a light bucket to make the most of the southern sky. So I built 10" and 14" dobs in fairly quick succession.

An optically excellent 10" dob is a great balance between portability and aperture. But as this thread illustrates, there are many ways to skin this particular cat (that's 'cat' as in feline, not 'catadioptric' ).
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-03-2008, 12:34 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmcpb View Post
Or, maybe you will be one of us strange group who actually enjoy the hunt
Couldn't agree more. Goto for imaging, star hopping for visual.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-03-2008, 12:52 PM
Screwdriverone's Avatar
Screwdriverone (Chris)
I have detailed files....

Screwdriverone is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
Hi Iceworks,

I would have to agree, the binoculars I have (11X70mm) are the bees knees when it comes to seeing lots of things quickly and cheaply (and EASY too).

For $130 I effectively have 2 - 70mm refractors that I can carry around my neck and look at nebulas, double stars and clusters. In fact, since I have bought them, I have used them more and for longer than my 5 inch Newtonian simply because I can chuck them in the car, drive for 5-30 mins depending on how far I want to get away from the house, and sit in my car looking through the sunroof (or is it a mobile Astronomy dome?) in Dark Skies and get blown away at just how much I can see in 10-30 minutes.

Last weekend, only 5 mins from home where there are no street lights, I managed to spot and view M5, M8, M3, M13, 47 Tuc, NGC 3532, NGC 2669 etc etc etc in about 30 minutes and it was GREAT!.

Having said all that, my $400 5 inch Newt is TOPS for looking at Jupiter and Saturn and the moon as well as resolving globular clusters and nebulas at sizes and details that leave the binos in the dust, just more fiddly and cumbersome and harder to set up.

With this gear I am never going to get the details in some of my shots that the big boys and girls get with their massive DOB's, SCT's, MAK's and higher quality ED gear, but for me, I still get blown away at what I can see for the combined price of a Playstation 3. Beat THAT Sony!

I ALMOST got talked into a 8" DOB for about $400 at the time I bought the Skywatcher, but I felt the benefit of tracking with my EQ2 mount outweighed the extra light capacity and details the larger scope would have brought. Plus the fact the DOB would have been relatively harder to "chuck in the car". Also, the scope I bought has now gone back up in price, and it came with a 5 Year Warranty as opposed to a 1 or 2 year one.

My two cents worth...

Chris

Last edited by Screwdriverone; 06-03-2008 at 03:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-03-2008, 04:27 PM
iceworks's Avatar
iceworks
Brett

iceworks is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Swan Hill
Posts: 49
The opinions coming in are fantastic, sounds like finding the best scope is harder than defining the ideal woman( apologies to any female astronomers, I don't mean to sound sexest). I figure we are all amateurs so ease of use must be a priority. GOTO is great because most of us are lazy. Most of us have realistic budgets, so we will never see the martians walking on Mars, maybe just more detail of planets, moon and nearby objects. There must be a limit to aperture size that is relevant to mere mortals. Quality optics must then be the important factor. Come on, hit me with your opinions.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-03-2008, 04:50 PM
Brian W's Avatar
Brian W (Brian)
The Wanderer

Brian W is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dumaguete Philippines
Posts: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceworks View Post
The opinions coming in are fantastic, sounds like finding the best scope is harder than defining the ideal woman( apologies to any female astronomers, I don't mean to sound sexest). I figure we are all amateurs so ease of use must be a priority. GOTO is great because most of us are lazy. Most of us have realistic budgets, so we will never see the martians walking on Mars, maybe just more detail of planets, moon and nearby objects. There must be a limit to aperture size that is relevant to mere mortals. Quality optics must then be the important factor. Come on, hit me with your opinions.
I have a 4.5" short tube reflector with f/3.9 which gives me incredible views. I also have the use of a 8" SCT which gives me incredible views but in a different way. We have ordered a 10" Orion xt classic. when it arrives we will undoubtedly find it gives us great views too. If we were to win several lotteries we might even buy a Takahashi refractor for US $500,000.00 and get great views.

I would suggest that any telescope of good quality will give you incredible views. The real question is; what type of quality views crank you up. Answer that question and you will know what scope you need to buy for the maximum wow factor.
Brian
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement