This seems to be another way to look at inertia, apart from Higgs ... at least, there is a lot of mathematical argument presented in the paper, not only ideas.. Perhaps the LHC will prove those guys right, if Higgs boson could not be found. http://www.calphysics.org/articles/gravity_arxiv.pdf
Anybody knows more abou this, since for me this is too much....
I have been trying to re read this Bojan... it is not easy but it seems to me that this chap makes an assumption as to the presence of "zero point energy"... which you may think is the same stuff that I go on about but it is not..zero point speculates that energy comes from particles as descrete units ..my view re push gravity is that the energy comes form particle movement not their individual properties...
However I have not read all the link I have not had net access and was kicked off the machine I was on halfway thru reading the link..
But it must say something notwithstanding the chaps attempt to sound very smart... what is he saying?... I think he says that there is a force that adds to momentum at this stage..what do you think he says..can anyone paraphrase this such that it could be read on the channel ten news and be understandable...
Ceratinly I can use it in my universe as I have maintained that momentum is simply "gravity" (flow..gravity rain ..whatever..) caught in mass and giving the mass some of its "speed"
Sorry this was not well considered and I am getting booted off this machine in a minute..mmm now.
alex
More on inertia and gravity..
