Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 21-02-2008, 09:05 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Jupiter from this morning

Another attempt at Jupiter this morning.. sadly conditions were no better than yesterday. Transparency was better, but seeing was terrible and by the time Jupiter rose high enough to start getting stable, clouds forced me to give it away for the day.

Not much to identify in the way of features at this poor resolution, but the SEB seems to have settled down and is now looking quite normal - though the NEB is still quite a bit darker.

12" newt on EQ6, DMK21AU04 @ 15fps.

Thanks for looking.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (20080220_1754-jup1.jpg)
37.0 KB25 views
Click for full-size image (20080220_1821-jup2.jpg)
37.0 KB49 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-02-2008, 10:52 AM
edwardsdj's Avatar
edwardsdj (Doug)
Doug Edwards

edwardsdj is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
Great that you've captured the great planet Mike

Hope conditions improve for you soon.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-02-2008, 01:31 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
its an improvement fromthe last one me thinks...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-02-2008, 05:55 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Good effort Mike. An improvement from your last one.

I'm sure the conditions will improve soon.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-02-2008, 07:09 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
Not much to identify in the way of features at this poor resolution
features........it s a planet!!!

joop joop joop
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-02-2008, 07:41 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post

DMK21AU04 @ 15fps.

.
going to grill you for information, probably do this for a while so get used to it

Was this frame rate for all the colours, are we talking LRGB, how many frames for each color and what time length from first frame to last frame (interested in rotation issues). thats it for now
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-02-2008, 06:52 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy View Post
going to grill you for information, probably do this for a while so get used to it

Was this frame rate for all the colours, are we talking LRGB, how many frames for each color and what time length from first frame to last frame (interested in rotation issues). thats it for now
No worries Alchemy, keep asking questions.

I used 15fps for all the colour channels, though the gain varied between channels. The green channel is the brightest, red is a little dimmer, and blue is the dimmest by a fair margin. So I adjust the gain between channels to keep the histogram at around the same point for each channel.
Sometimes that means reducing the framerate for blue (eg: 30fps for red and green, 15fps for blue), but with Jupiter still fairly low and nowhere near as bright as it will get, at 30fps the histogram was only half full in green channel.

I captured for 40s each colour channel, giving me 600 frames in total. I stacked about 170 from each colour channel. It takes about 10 seconds between colour channels to change filter, change settings and double-check focus.

So there is some rotation between the first frame of the red channel, and the last frame of the blue channel - no doubt about it. But within each channel (40s) there is no rotation. What that means is that you need to align on the features within the planet when recombining into RGB, rather than aligning on the limb. You'll get a slight (1-3 pixels) red edge on one side and blue edge on the other side.

Hope that helps.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22-02-2008, 07:06 AM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
Thanks for your reply, i know you often post early morning so ive been watching to see your answer (methinks you slept in this morning)

the items you posted are of a great help, i will copy and paste to a sheet, and add other bits as nessecary so i can have a quick referencefor my first few tries.

thanks
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22-02-2008, 07:10 AM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
just rereviewed your reply, did you use a luminence channel ? or is this more restricted to deep sky viewing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 22-02-2008, 07:14 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Oh sorry forgot to answer that bit - I didn't use Luminance, just RGB. For planetary, most times the Luminance channel is blurrier than the others - the spread of wavelengths just doesn't give a sharp image.

I've only been successful using it on Jupiter once or twice last year.

I didn't sleep in, but I had to catch a later train.. was outside imaging Jupiter this morning in good seeing! results later
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement