Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-08-2007, 06:59 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Question ED80, DSI II Pro, Focal reducer

About to re-enter imaging (and observing).... I think I'm going to try a focal reducer with the ED80 and DSI Pro - probably the Bintel 0.5 job.
Will this work all right? Is anyone using a similar set-up?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-08-2007, 08:18 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Yep Lee. I do.

Here is an example of the same objects with and without the FR.

Same gear as yours: ED80 and camera equal to 6mm EP FOV. (DSI, LPI, Toucam, Neximage etc).

You will also notice that you will capture better colour at shorter exposures with a Focal Reducer

1. M83 normal ED80.
2. M83 with Focal Reducer in ED80
3. Trifid normal ED80
4. Trifid with Focal Reducer in ED80
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M83 stacked 10 April 2007_filtered.jpg)
115.2 KB65 views
Click for full-size image (M83 final run.jpg)
58.6 KB74 views
Click for full-size image (Trifid up close 11 May 2007 finished.jpg)
125.4 KB52 views
Click for full-size image (Trifid with IR Filter.jpg)
140.4 KB61 views
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-08-2007, 10:27 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Thanks Ken, just the info I needed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-08-2007, 11:31 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Lee,
they aren't good examples of quality of image. They haven't been processed. I used those images coz they were the first I could find of the same objects showing the FOV difference of the 2 methods.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2007, 04:41 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Lee I've used both the Bintel one and the Steve Massey one and much prefer the Steve Massey one. If at some stage you decide to get a DSLR I can thoroughly recommend the WO 0.8 Field Flattener and reducer. I've just given it a week of trials out at Qld Astrofest and I'm very happy for a moderately priced FR and flattener.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2007, 08:48 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
What is the "Steve Massey" one Paul? Haven't heard of that one.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-08-2007, 09:12 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
My sorries Lee, it should have been the Steve Mogg
http://webcaddy.com.au/astro/Product...sp?cat=reducer
http://webcaddy.com.au/astro/F-066FR-pics.htm



My only excuse is too many 3:00 - 4:30 mornings during the week

Btw the bintel one is only 0.5x if you add the extension (same with the Mogg one). Be careful with it, you may not be able to come to focus with it. I know with my ED80 with the WO 10:1 focuser I have only just enough in travel with the extension tube and only just enough on the outfocus without the extension tube. It's np on an SCT though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-08-2007, 06:29 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Do you know if the WO focuser has more or less in travel than the standard???
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13-08-2007, 06:44 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
The WO comes to focus np at all. It is designed for 66 - 80 mm refractors. It slots into the 2" focal tube and screws to a T thread for your canon or other CCD camera
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-11-2007, 08:59 AM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Excuse my bumping.....

The WO FR and an ED80 - what f/ratio will I get???
Is it correct to say f/7.5 x 0.8 = f/6??
cheers.....
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-11-2007, 09:06 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Yes, that's right Lee.

FL will be 480mm, aperture is still 80mm, F/R = FL/Ap = f/6.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement