Quote:
Originally Posted by nightstalker
I was thinking it was a bug ..and.. wondering why this has a UFO /conspiricy therory attached straight off the bat without the slightest hint of skeptisism or any reasnable attempt to find a more obvious explanation . 
|
It wouldn't be a UFO/conspiracy theory unless they jumped to conclusions. I'm yet to see a single UFO video where the 'believers' haven't jumped to conclusions. The BEST video I've seen has the 'believer' pointing out characteristics of the video and explaining why that COULD be explained by an alien spaceship (and thus their conclusion was that the objects were aliens). That's all well and good, I thought. But they could ALSO be explained much more simply without resorting to fantastical measures backed up by nothing more than conjecture. Another tell-tale sign of a UFO theory is that if nobody can work out what the object is, it's automatically an alien spaceship - NO EXCEPTIONS. Whilst they are certainly a plague to astronomy, I love the UFO 'believers' - they're more entertaining than TV.
As for this video, what is it? Who knows! It is unfocused so as far as it appears, we'll never get a definite answer anyway. Do we need to jump to the "it's an alien spaceship!" conclusion? No. As already mentioned it could be a weather balloon, a bug, a bat, a plane with busted lights, etc. There are 1001 rational possible explanations - so why resort to a stupid irrational explanation.
(Of course, in this post I used the word 'UFO' to mean 'aliens', not its proper term of 'Unidentified Flying Objects'. As far as I can tell, the maker of this video hasn't used the word 'alien' at all, so they probably aren't suggesting it is one).