Go Back   IceInSpace > IceTrade Classifieds > IceTrade Archives
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-09-2007, 01:40 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,917
Wanted: Camera tripod/fluid head

Currently I have a Slik 300 tripod with non-removable 3-way pan/tilt head. Would like something of similar weight (maybe a bit heavier) but with a nice fluid head, something strong enough for my William Optics 80mm scope (mainly for terrestrial use but also for astronomical use when travelling).

Will consider tripods & heads sold separately or together, and will also consider using my current tripod as part exchange (it's in near mint condition, black model with quick release plate).

Cheers

Morton
  #2  
Old 11-09-2007, 02:22 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Morton - I've just bought a Velbon CX686 for $165 from Bintel to do just what you want to do. I mount the Megrez and Nikon and it still holds its position. Very nice and fluid too with the Velbon PH- 368 oiled fluid video panhead.

Cheers
Chris
  #3  
Old 11-09-2007, 05:46 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,917
Hi Chris, interesting. Bintel's site says max load is 3kg, which you must be over a bit with the Megrez and Nikon, although maybe not by much?

Morton
  #4  
Old 12-09-2007, 08:34 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
I suspect that the "3Kg" limit is a little understated, as per usual, Morton. The Megrez/Nikon combo weigh more than that and although I wouldn't want to rely on the resultant strength/weight ratio for tracking - it's just sitting there. Balance seems to be the biggest issue, not strength, in how the fluid head resists further motion once its position is set. With just the scope attached using the L-bracket and no camera it's pretty stable. For terrestrial viewing it's fine. For astro it's a borderline case when you reach zenith because of the balance factor - which you will get, as a problem, with any normal terrestrial camera tripod I think.

Cheers
Chris
  #5  
Old 12-09-2007, 01:17 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Have PM'ed you
Allan
  #6  
Old 27-09-2007, 01:35 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
fluid head

I found this on ebay - pretty sure it has a fluid head like you're after
I thin it was $270
or just search for manfrottohttp://cgi.ebay.com.au/Manfrotto-190...QQcmdZViewItem
I would be interested to hear from you why you are after the fluid head - are they a lot better than 3 way pan/tilt
thanks daniel
  #7  
Old 27-09-2007, 02:22 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,917
Nice head but the 190 legs are less sturdy than my current tripod.

I've read for years that a fluid head is better for mounting a scope. It gives more control of the movement and, if sturdy enough, should have a bit less sag than a normal pan/tilt head. Depends on the size and weight of the scope, of course.

Morton
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement