ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waxing Gibbous 96%
|
|

20-07-2007, 10:48 PM
|
 |
Supernova Searcher
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
|
|
New Moon For Saturn
|

21-07-2007, 12:55 AM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
 60 Moons and possibly rising!!!!
Amazing stuff!!!
|

21-07-2007, 12:56 AM
|
 |
Space Explorer
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Caloundra, Sunshine Coast, Australia
Posts: 1,571
|
|
Jupiter is still ahead moon-wise, but for how much longer? Could Saturn overtake Jupe - quite possible with Cassini looking around in such detail.
|

21-07-2007, 07:04 AM
|
 |
Sir Post a Lot!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
|
|
Exactly right Steve, I'd imagine if they let an orbiter stay around Jupiter for a year or two they'd find many more small moons as well.
I'm not sure if there's any plans for a future Jupiter orbiter, perhaps they know enough about the giant planet already. I can only dream - imagine the images they'd send back of the planet and the galilean moons. The pass-by images from New Horizons were spectacular.
Cassini has been a great mission, certainly a lot to learn out there.
|

21-07-2007, 12:38 PM
|
 |
Supernova Searcher
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
Exactly right Steve, I'd imagine if they let an orbiter stay around Jupiter for a year or two they'd find many more small moons as well.
I'm not sure if there's any plans for a future Jupiter orbiter, perhaps they know enough about the giant planet already. I can only dream - imagine the images they'd send back of the planet and the galilean moons. The pass-by images from New Horizons were spectacula
Cassini has been a great mission, certainly a lot to learn out there.
|
Wouldn't you like a seat on the next orbiter Mike  but as long as they gave you a return ticket
|

21-07-2007, 07:07 PM
|
gosh i love imaging
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: manchester uk
Posts: 286
|
|
could it be possible that saturn is creating its own asteroid belt system , with over 60 moons shurely this could be a possibility for the future
|

22-07-2007, 11:46 AM
|
 |
Meteor & fossil collector
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bentleigh
Posts: 1,386
|
|
Eventually they will face the same problems with the definition of what constitutes a moon as the recent definition of what is a planet. How small does a moon have to be before it is considered nothing more than a rock or debris?
If they discovered a rock the size of a basketball orbiting Saturn, is it a moon? How about "dwarf moon"? What if it is the size of bus? If something the size of a bus were considered to be a moon, would that have made Skylab a temporary moon of the earth? If one of these smaller moons were to break up, which one retains the original name, the larger? Does the other bit get an "a" designation or another name? What if the two bits are bigger than some of the other small moons, would that warrant a completely new name for the smaller fragment? Hmm....
|

22-07-2007, 12:45 PM
|
 |
Sir Post a Lot!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
|
|
The definition of a moon is simply something orbiting another body (and not orbiting the sun), so I don't think it matters how big or small it is.
There are asteroids that have "moons" orbiting them.
|

23-07-2007, 01:35 PM
|
 |
A Lazy Astronomer
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 614
|
|
Sooner or later they will have to make that call. Saturn's rings are made up of multi trillions of moons by your definition (ie anything) and I certainly wouldn't like the job of identifying or catagorising (or naming) all of them!
Most asteroid moons appear to be of a reasonable size to date (most in the 1km+ category though the NEO ones are much smaller). ( http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astr...idmoons.html#2)
Cheers
|

23-07-2007, 01:38 PM
|
 |
Sir Post a Lot!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
|
|
yeh you're right David - I was going to reply to my own post this morning when I was thinking about Saturn's rings..
I guess they'll have to classify it as orbiting another body but not within a ring system, maybe.
I'm sure there's thousands of small rocks orbiting Saturn and Jupiter that aren't in the ring plane but aren't classifieds as moons, either.
|

23-07-2007, 01:47 PM
|
 |
A Lazy Astronomer
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 614
|
|
LOL - whats the difference between a Rock and a Boulder?
|

23-07-2007, 11:41 PM
|
 |
bewise betold neverbecold
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Terrigal NSW
Posts: 3,828
|
|
you can throw a rock
geoff
|

24-07-2007, 08:03 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ballarat, Vic
Posts: 83
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by higginsdj
LOL - whats the difference between a Rock and a Boulder?
|
I once visited Boulder...nice place
Rick
|

24-07-2007, 12:39 PM
|
 |
Meteor & fossil collector
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bentleigh
Posts: 1,386
|
|
Maybe "a Moon" is something that orbits "a planet" or "dwarf planet" that has "cleared its orbit" to quote another famous definition!
But then again, what do you call something that orbits "a moon" without ending up with a circular reference! Sorry, I'm a computer programmer and I hate getting a circular reference...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:19 PM.
|
|