Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-08-2024, 11:11 AM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 979
Hubble Deep Field - South (30+ hours)

The Deep Field images from the Hubble telescope (and more recently from the James Webb Space Telescope) have long fascinated me, providing a glimpse into the dawn of our Universe - literally billions of years ago. I've often wondered what these would look like with an Earth-based amateur telescope. I was aware of Roger Groom's image of this target from several years back, so was keen to see what I could achieve with my more modest equipment. So time for an experiment !

This is my attempt at the Hubble Deep Field South (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Deep_Field_South), captured here with a humble 200mm newtonian (operating at f4.75) and QHY294C OSC camera and Optolong UV-IR filter on a (12 year old) NEQ6 mount.
30.42 hours (365 x 5 min exposures) across 2 July-6 Aug from Strathalbyn SA. Basic processing in Pixinsight (x2 drizzle, GraXpert, SPCC, BX, NX, HT).
Really only scratching the surface when compared with the Hubble image. Nonetheless, some HDF-S galaxies have been recorded, including ISOHDFS27 (mag 20.51) towards the bottom right (at one time thought to be the largest spiral galaxy in the universe).

Using Pixinsight's AnnotateImage script, it seems that this image has detected objects at least to Mag 21.1 (Quasar J22339-6022 - at Mag 21.10 - is visible in my image, where as J22337-6031 - at Mag 21.90 - is not). The most distant object to be captured as far as I can tell is quasar J2233-606 with a redshift of z=2.238, which if I understand correctly means the photons from that target were travelling through space for approx 11.5 BILLION years (!!!) before being captured with my backyard telescope and camera - which I think is pretty darn cool.

Not necessarily a "pretty" final image, and nowhere near as close to the Hubble image (or even Roger's image) as I would have (foolishly) hoped after 30+ hours, but (for a space nerd like me) a very interesting and fun experiment nonetheless.

https://www.astrobin.com/earkm8/
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (hdf-s1 wide.jpg)
180.8 KB59 views
Click for full-size image (hdf-s1.jpg)
157.7 KB56 views
Click for full-size image (hdf-s process 1 preview 1.jpg)
187.2 KB51 views
Click for full-size image (redshift.jpg)
44.6 KB34 views

Last edited by rmuhlack; 13-08-2024 at 01:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-08-2024, 01:49 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,682
Great project Richard, bit of time and effort there. Looks like there are only four stars in your version of the deep field and all other smudges and dots are galaxies, very cool

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-08-2024, 12:33 PM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 979
Thanks Mike.

30 hours for a few smudges and dots just shows how deep the HDF-S image really is, and hints at the galaxies that are hidden in the background of every deep sky image we take. Kinda mind boggling really.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-08-2024, 06:09 PM
E_ri_k (Erik)
Registered User

E_ri_k is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lakes Entrance
Posts: 846
Pretty darn cool for sure! Very cool experiment.

Erik
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement