Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-01-2024, 08:34 AM
Plossl68 (Paul)
Registered User

Plossl68 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Melbourne, australia
Posts: 64
NYE Pleiades

Too long since I was out trying Astro… same old story: new job, never a good sky when you have any time etc….Anyway, we were away in Daylesford for NYE with nice Bortle 4 skies. It was windy but clear and I managed to catch 20 x 2min subs of this favourite before it dipped behind the trees. Don’t look too closely as I’ve teardropped the stars (wind?).

Redcat 51
Zwo 2600MC (love this camera!)
SkyGuider pro
20 x 2 min light
20 x 2 min dark
No flats or bias
Stacked and processed in Affinity Photo.
Now added a second version, processed a little further to draw out the nebulosity from the same data.

Any and all feedback welcome.
Clear skies,
Paul
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_2024-01-05-095824.jpg)
154.9 KB100 views
Click for full-size image (Pleides5 (2).jpg)
191.6 KB105 views

Last edited by Plossl68; 05-01-2024 at 12:07 PM. Reason: Added second photo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2024, 10:09 AM
Mickoid (Michael)
Registered User

Mickoid is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,533
Paul you have definitely brought out more nebulosity with your second process but at the expense of increasing noise and colour balance due to the stretch. This occurs because you have limited data to start with and those areas which received less signal have a higher noise ratio. There are ways to hide this effect but ultimately it is much better to have more data to start with. If this dismal weather clears over the next few days just gather more data on the object and add it to what you already have. You will then have much more to play with and the nebulosity will be revealed without having to stretch the image so much. It looks like you have your equipment working well with nice tight stars, so you're off to a good start!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2024, 02:15 PM
Plossl68 (Paul)
Registered User

Plossl68 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Melbourne, australia
Posts: 64
Thanks Michael,

I appreciate the advice and will look for opportunities to gather more data. Do you have any thoughts on the teardropping of the larger stars please? It was windy and the SkyGuider is pretty light so I was thinking that was it, but is there something else that I’m missing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickoid View Post
Paul you have definitely brought out more nebulosity with your second process but at the expense of increasing noise and colour balance due to the stretch. This occurs because you have limited data to start with and those areas which received less signal have a higher noise ratio. There are ways to hide this effect but ultimately it is much better to have more data to start with. If this dismal weather clears over the next few days just gather more data on the object and add it to what you already have. You will then have much more to play with and the nebulosity will be revealed without having to stretch the image so much. It looks like you have your equipment working well with nice tight stars, so you're off to a good start!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-01-2024, 05:31 PM
Mickoid (Michael)
Registered User

Mickoid is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,533
Quote:
It looks like you have your equipment working well with nice tight stars
I hadn't looked that close when I posted this. You do have 'Eggy' stars which are most probably caused by mount tracking error. If only a few subs you took has these odd shaped stars, then it could be wind or mount PE. A 2min exposure is a lot to ask from an unguided SkyGuider Pro mount at 250mm focal length. Wind or no wind your Polar alignment would have to be very accurate to achieve round stars over 2 mins. Try cutting the exposure back to 1 min and just do more of them
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2024, 08:17 PM
Plossl68 (Paul)
Registered User

Plossl68 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Melbourne, australia
Posts: 64
Thanks Michael,

My bad. I should have said I was guiding via an ASIAIR+ which indicated guiding error of about 0.5 RMS. There is a bit of variation between the eggyness of the stars between the subs too. The final thing is that I suspect I might be stretching the weight limits of the SkyGuider Pro. With the RedCat + EAF + camera, I had to add the balance weight extension arm and addition weight to balance in RA. Being at the limit if it’s capability can’t be helping

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickoid View Post
I hadn't looked that close when I posted this. You do have 'Eggy' stars which are most probably caused by mount tracking error. If only a few subs you took has these odd shaped stars, then it could be wind or mount PE. A 2min exposure is a lot to ask from an unguided SkyGuider Pro mount at 250mm focal length. Wind or no wind your Polar alignment would have to be very accurate to achieve round stars over 2 mins. Try cutting the exposure back to 1 min and just do more of them
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement