Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-10-2023, 02:17 PM
Hans Tucker (Hans)
Registered User

Hans Tucker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,476
What's in a Number

Can you visually see the difference between a refractor that has a Strehl ratio of 0.95 compared to refractors that have Strehl ratio of 0.99 or 0.998?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-10-2023, 06:26 PM
Leo.G (Leo)
Registered User

Leo.G is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,599
I don't know if the following link may help answer your question Hans, it's beyond the capabilities of my pathetic brain (any more than 2 syllable words are beyond my comprehension) but it is an interesting read on cloudy nights discussing much the same and a couple of other interesting links:


https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/8...by-wavelength/


https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/8...higher-strehl/



http://www.rfroyce.com/standards.htm


I only have achromat refractors, I'm more concerned about street light ratios than Strehl ratios.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-10-2023, 09:56 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hans Tucker View Post
Can you visually see the difference between a refractor that has a Strehl ratio of 0.95 compared to refractors that have Strehl ratio of 0.99 or 0.998?
You would probably notice it more in images.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-10-2023, 10:49 AM
By.Jove (Jove)
Registered User

By.Jove is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Sydney
Posts: 140
The first issue is whether you’re looking at a monochromatic (probably green) strehl measurement or polychromatic (visible spectrum) in which case the figure is invariably worse. From memory there is a detailed analysis I’ve seen suggested refractors - including APOs - cannot exceed strehl 0.95.

AFAIK you need a reflector (Newtonian) to achieve better.

Then there is this page.
https://www.telescope-optics.net/com...telescopes.htm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-10-2023, 10:52 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,470
In company with a good friend who I’d classify as one of the most skilled planetary observers in Oz we did just such a test.

Comparing two excellent refractors (.97 vs .94 ) it was extremely difficult to separate them visually but at silly magnifications (read 1200x) the higher strehl unit simply ran out of light rather than showing any image degradation (as was seen in the .94).

Even then you had to wait for fleeting moments of excellent seeing.

Where a higher strehl really comes into play is because it gives you more of a buffer from seeing perturbations when imaging. Systems that are barely diffraction limited instantly fall below that threshold with any seeing disturbances and often fail to deliver tight stellar profiles as a result.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement